Evolutionary Exploration of the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma - The Effect of Out-of-Equilibrium Play

K. Lindgren, V. Verendel
{"title":"Evolutionary Exploration of the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma - The Effect of Out-of-Equilibrium Play","authors":"K. Lindgren, V. Verendel","doi":"10.3390/g4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The finitely repeated Prisoners Dilemma is a good illustration of the discrepancy between the strategic behaviour suggested by a game-theoretic analysis and the behaviour often observed among human players, where cooperation is maintained through most of the game. A game-theoretic reasoning based on backward induction eliminates strategies step by step until defection from the first round is the only remaining choice, reflecting the Nash equilibrium of the game. We investigate the Nash equilibrium solution for two different sets of strategies in an evolutionary context, using replicator-mutation dynamics. The first set consists of conditional cooperators, up to a certain round, while the second set in addition to these contains two strategy types that react differently on the first round action: The “Convincer strategies insist with two rounds of initial cooperation, trying to establish more cooperative play in the game, while the “Follower strategies, although being first round defectors, have the capability to respond to an invite in the first round. For both of these strategy sets, iterated elimination of strategies shows that the only Nash equilibria are given by defection from the first round. We show that the evolutionary dynamics of the first set is always characterised by a stable fixed point, corresponding to the Nash equilibrium, if the mutation rate is sufficiently small (but still positive). The second strategy set is numerically investigated, and we find that there are regions of parameter space where fixed points become unstable and the dynamics exhibits cycles of different strategy compositions. The results indicate that, even in the limit of very small mutation rate, the replicator-mutation dynamics does not necessarily bring the system with Convincers and Followers to the fixed point corresponding to the Nash equilibrium of the game. We also perform a detailed analysis of how the evolutionary behaviour depends on payoffs, game length, and mutation rate. Reference: Lindgren K, Verendel V. Evolutionary Exploration of the Finitely Repeated Prisoners Dilemma – The Effect of Out-of- Equilibrium Play. Games, 4(1):1-20, 2013.","PeriodicalId":432647,"journal":{"name":"Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/g4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The finitely repeated Prisoners Dilemma is a good illustration of the discrepancy between the strategic behaviour suggested by a game-theoretic analysis and the behaviour often observed among human players, where cooperation is maintained through most of the game. A game-theoretic reasoning based on backward induction eliminates strategies step by step until defection from the first round is the only remaining choice, reflecting the Nash equilibrium of the game. We investigate the Nash equilibrium solution for two different sets of strategies in an evolutionary context, using replicator-mutation dynamics. The first set consists of conditional cooperators, up to a certain round, while the second set in addition to these contains two strategy types that react differently on the first round action: The “Convincer strategies insist with two rounds of initial cooperation, trying to establish more cooperative play in the game, while the “Follower strategies, although being first round defectors, have the capability to respond to an invite in the first round. For both of these strategy sets, iterated elimination of strategies shows that the only Nash equilibria are given by defection from the first round. We show that the evolutionary dynamics of the first set is always characterised by a stable fixed point, corresponding to the Nash equilibrium, if the mutation rate is sufficiently small (but still positive). The second strategy set is numerically investigated, and we find that there are regions of parameter space where fixed points become unstable and the dynamics exhibits cycles of different strategy compositions. The results indicate that, even in the limit of very small mutation rate, the replicator-mutation dynamics does not necessarily bring the system with Convincers and Followers to the fixed point corresponding to the Nash equilibrium of the game. We also perform a detailed analysis of how the evolutionary behaviour depends on payoffs, game length, and mutation rate. Reference: Lindgren K, Verendel V. Evolutionary Exploration of the Finitely Repeated Prisoners Dilemma – The Effect of Out-of- Equilibrium Play. Games, 4(1):1-20, 2013.
有限重复囚徒困境的进化探索——非均衡博弈的影响
有限重复的囚徒困境很好地说明了博弈论分析所建议的战略行为与人类玩家的行为之间的差异,在人类玩家中,合作在游戏的大部分时间里都是保持的。基于逆向归纳法的博弈论推理逐步消除策略,直到第一轮的背叛成为唯一的选择,反映了博弈的纳什均衡。我们研究了在进化背景下两套不同策略的纳什均衡解决方案,使用复制-突变动力学。第一组由有条件的合作者组成,直到某一轮,而第二组除了这些之外,还包含两种对第一轮行动做出不同反应的策略类型:“说服者”策略坚持两轮初始合作,试图在游戏中建立更多的合作玩法,而“追随者”策略虽然是第一轮的叛逆者,但有能力在第一轮回应邀请。对于这两种策略集,策略的迭代消去表明,唯一的纳什均衡是由第一轮的背叛给出的。我们证明,如果突变率足够小(但仍然是正的),第一组的进化动力学总是以一个稳定的不动点为特征,对应于纳什均衡。对第二个策略集进行了数值研究,发现在参数空间中存在不动点变得不稳定的区域,并且动力学表现出不同策略组合的循环。结果表明,即使在非常小的突变率极限下,复制因子-突变动力学也不一定使具有说服者和追随者的系统达到博弈纳什均衡所对应的不动点。我们还详细分析了进化行为如何取决于收益、博弈长度和突变率。参考:林德格伦K,维伦德尔V.有限重复囚徒困境的进化探索——非均衡博弈的影响。游戏,4(1):1-20,2013。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信