Ancillary Activity and Productivity

Stéphane Carvalho
{"title":"Ancillary Activity and Productivity","authors":"Stéphane Carvalho","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3715812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administrative tasks, bureaucracy lead to more constraints in the enterprise, we propose to consider explicitly these activities in the production theory and its implications on productivity and economic growth. We propose an alternative production function which encompasses not only inputs needed for the production of the good sold on the market (the core production), but also explicitly all administrative and logistic departments (the ancillary activities). We assume complementarity between them. The main contribution of this paper is the determination of ancillary inputs productivity and therefore their retribution. In the last section we give two succinct applications of our model. The first application concerns the Productivity Paradox debate. Indeed, the impact of a technological innovation depends with the model if it is ancillary oriented or not. Complementarity assumption prevents any spillover effects between activities. The second application is about growth theory. The model explains the mechanism at work about why bureaucracy hampers economic growth. Again the complementarity assumption is all the story.","PeriodicalId":237187,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3715812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Administrative tasks, bureaucracy lead to more constraints in the enterprise, we propose to consider explicitly these activities in the production theory and its implications on productivity and economic growth. We propose an alternative production function which encompasses not only inputs needed for the production of the good sold on the market (the core production), but also explicitly all administrative and logistic departments (the ancillary activities). We assume complementarity between them. The main contribution of this paper is the determination of ancillary inputs productivity and therefore their retribution. In the last section we give two succinct applications of our model. The first application concerns the Productivity Paradox debate. Indeed, the impact of a technological innovation depends with the model if it is ancillary oriented or not. Complementarity assumption prevents any spillover effects between activities. The second application is about growth theory. The model explains the mechanism at work about why bureaucracy hampers economic growth. Again the complementarity assumption is all the story.
辅助活动及生产力
行政任务、官僚主义导致企业中更多的约束,我们建议在生产理论中明确考虑这些活动及其对生产率和经济增长的影响。我们提出了另一种生产功能,它不仅包括生产在市场上销售的商品所需的投入(核心生产),而且明确地包括所有行政和物流部门(辅助活动)。我们假定它们之间是互补的。本文的主要贡献在于确定了辅助投入的生产率,从而确定了它们的报酬。在最后一节中,我们给出了模型的两个简洁应用。第一个应用是关于生产力悖论的争论。事实上,技术创新的影响取决于模型是否为辅助导向。互补性假设防止了活动之间的溢出效应。第二个应用是关于增长理论的。该模型解释了官僚主义阻碍经济增长的机制。再一次,互补性假设是所有的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信