The Future of Work: The Gig Economy and Pressures on the Tax System

Celeste M. Black
{"title":"The Future of Work: The Gig Economy and Pressures on the Tax System","authors":"Celeste M. Black","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.1.sym.black","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a number of common-law jurisdictions, gig workers (that is, workers who provide services through the use of web-based digital platforms) have recently sought to claim labour protections reserved for employees, such as the minimum wage, sick leave, and protection from unfair dismissal. These cases often involve the application of the multifactorial common-law test of employment to this new context, and the outcomes turn on the specifics of each case. In addition, classification as an employee has ramifications for a variety of tax matters. In this paper, the author considers whether the tax rules currently in place to capture non-standard employment arrangements have sufficient flexibility to capture gig workers. The focus of the analysis is Australian taxes (in particular, income tax, compulsory retirement savings contributions, and payroll tax), but reference is also made to similar issues under the laws of Canada. The author submits that, with respect to Australian income tax, gig work does not present a substantial risk to the tax base as a legal matter; however, a risk to the national revenue base comes from the compliance gap that is exposed when workers are no longer covered by employers' withholding mechanisms but are not picked up by tax administration regimes designed with larger businesses in mind. The author suggests that reliance on the registration of small businesses through the Australian business number, coupled with a new mandatory reporting regime for gig work platforms, would go a long way toward filling the transparency gap, and that doing so would both foster the voluntary compliance of gig workers and provide revenue authorities with data that could be used to detect non-compliance. A real risk exists that many gig workers will be outside the scope of the retirement contributions scheme and payroll tax and that the government, in consequence, will need to consider whether it is appropriate policy to change the law to include these on-demand workers.","PeriodicalId":368747,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Tax Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Tax Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2020.68.1.sym.black","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In a number of common-law jurisdictions, gig workers (that is, workers who provide services through the use of web-based digital platforms) have recently sought to claim labour protections reserved for employees, such as the minimum wage, sick leave, and protection from unfair dismissal. These cases often involve the application of the multifactorial common-law test of employment to this new context, and the outcomes turn on the specifics of each case. In addition, classification as an employee has ramifications for a variety of tax matters. In this paper, the author considers whether the tax rules currently in place to capture non-standard employment arrangements have sufficient flexibility to capture gig workers. The focus of the analysis is Australian taxes (in particular, income tax, compulsory retirement savings contributions, and payroll tax), but reference is also made to similar issues under the laws of Canada. The author submits that, with respect to Australian income tax, gig work does not present a substantial risk to the tax base as a legal matter; however, a risk to the national revenue base comes from the compliance gap that is exposed when workers are no longer covered by employers' withholding mechanisms but are not picked up by tax administration regimes designed with larger businesses in mind. The author suggests that reliance on the registration of small businesses through the Australian business number, coupled with a new mandatory reporting regime for gig work platforms, would go a long way toward filling the transparency gap, and that doing so would both foster the voluntary compliance of gig workers and provide revenue authorities with data that could be used to detect non-compliance. A real risk exists that many gig workers will be outside the scope of the retirement contributions scheme and payroll tax and that the government, in consequence, will need to consider whether it is appropriate policy to change the law to include these on-demand workers.
工作的未来:零工经济和税收系统的压力
在一些普通法司法管辖区,零工工人(即通过使用基于网络的数字平台提供服务的工人)最近寻求要求为雇员保留的劳动保护,如最低工资、病假和免受不公平解雇的保护。这些案件通常涉及在这种新的背景下应用多因素普通法雇佣检验,结果取决于每个案件的具体情况。此外,归类为雇员对各种税务问题也有影响。在本文中,作者考虑了目前用于捕获非标准就业安排的税收规则是否具有足够的灵活性来捕获零工工人。分析的重点是澳大利亚的税收(特别是所得税、强制性退休储蓄缴款和工资税),但也参考了加拿大法律下的类似问题。发件人认为,就澳大利亚的所得税而言,零工作为一个法律问题不会对税基构成重大风险;然而,国家收入基础面临的一个风险来自合规缺口,当雇主的预扣机制不再覆盖工人,但为更大企业设计的税收管理制度却没有考虑到这一点时,合规缺口就会暴露出来。作者建议,通过澳大利亚商业号码对小企业进行注册,再加上对零工工作平台实行新的强制性报告制度,将大大有助于填补透明度差距,这样做既可以促进零工工人的自愿遵守,也可以为税收当局提供可用于发现违规行为的数据。真正存在的风险是,许多零工工人将被排除在退休供款计划和工资税的范围之外,因此,政府将需要考虑修改法律,将这些按需工人包括在内,这是否是一项合适的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信