Comparison of Data Dissemination Protocols for Road Traffic Collecting Application in a Vehicular Ad hoc Network

Singha Wongdeethai, P. Siripongwutikorn, K. Gyoda
{"title":"Comparison of Data Dissemination Protocols for Road Traffic Collecting Application in a Vehicular Ad hoc Network","authors":"Singha Wongdeethai, P. Siripongwutikorn, K. Gyoda","doi":"10.14416/J.IJAST.2017.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing real-time road traffic information to drivers is a critical step to improve road traffic efficiency by allowing appropriate routes to be chosen. In a Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET), a query message can be disseminated along several road paths for collecting road traffic information. While several VANET protocols have been proposed to accomplish such task, they were evaluated in different settings, environments, and a limited scale. To gain better insights for actual deployment, it is necessary to explore their relative performance advantages and limitations. In this paper, we compare Slotted 1 persistence, Efficient Directional Broadcast (EDB), Data dissemination pRotocol In VEhicular networks (DRIVE), and Road Traffic Collecting (RTC) protocols under a large scale city networks, high vehicle density, multiple query sessions, and the presence of interfering background traffic. The evaluation focuses on the average percentage of targeted road segment coverage, the total number of transmitted messages, and the completion delay time. The results show that EDB outperforms other protocols in terms of the road segment coverage with highest number of transmitted messages while RTC yields a lower number of transmitted messages with less road segment coverage. However, EDB requires road-side units at every intersection and its performance dramatically drops under the failure of road-side units.","PeriodicalId":352801,"journal":{"name":"King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok International Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok International Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14416/J.IJAST.2017.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing real-time road traffic information to drivers is a critical step to improve road traffic efficiency by allowing appropriate routes to be chosen. In a Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET), a query message can be disseminated along several road paths for collecting road traffic information. While several VANET protocols have been proposed to accomplish such task, they were evaluated in different settings, environments, and a limited scale. To gain better insights for actual deployment, it is necessary to explore their relative performance advantages and limitations. In this paper, we compare Slotted 1 persistence, Efficient Directional Broadcast (EDB), Data dissemination pRotocol In VEhicular networks (DRIVE), and Road Traffic Collecting (RTC) protocols under a large scale city networks, high vehicle density, multiple query sessions, and the presence of interfering background traffic. The evaluation focuses on the average percentage of targeted road segment coverage, the total number of transmitted messages, and the completion delay time. The results show that EDB outperforms other protocols in terms of the road segment coverage with highest number of transmitted messages while RTC yields a lower number of transmitted messages with less road segment coverage. However, EDB requires road-side units at every intersection and its performance dramatically drops under the failure of road-side units.
车辆自组织网络中道路交通采集数据发布协议的比较
向驾驶员提供实时道路交通信息是提高道路交通效率的关键一步,允许他们选择合适的路线。在车辆自组织网络(VANET)中,查询消息可以沿着多条道路传播,以收集道路交通信息。虽然已经提出了几种VANET协议来完成这一任务,但它们在不同的设置、环境和有限的规模下进行了评估。为了更好地了解实际部署,有必要探索它们的相对性能优势和局限性。在本文中,我们比较了在大规模城市网络、高车辆密度、多查询会话和存在干扰背景交通的情况下,开槽持久性、高效定向广播(EDB)、车联网数据传播协议(DRIVE)和道路交通采集(RTC)协议。评估的重点是目标路段覆盖的平均百分比、传输的消息总数和完成延迟时间。结果表明,EDB在传输消息数量最多的路段覆盖方面优于其他协议,而RTC在传输消息数量较少的路段覆盖方面优于其他协议。然而,EDB要求在每个十字路口都安装路侧单元,如果路侧单元出现故障,其性能会急剧下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信