Revisiting Concurrent Separation Logic and Operational Semantics

Pedro Soares, A. Ravara, S. Sousa
{"title":"Revisiting Concurrent Separation Logic and Operational Semantics","authors":"Pedro Soares, A. Ravara, S. Sousa","doi":"10.1109/PDP.2015.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a new soundness proof of Concurrent Separation Logic (CSL) based on a structural operational semantics (SOS). We build on two previous proofs and develop new auxiliary notions to achieve the goal. One uses a denotational semantics (based on traces). The other is based on SOS, but was obtained only for a fragment of the logic - the Disjoint CSL - which disallows modifying shared variables between concurrent threads. In this work, we lift such restriction, proving the soundness of full CSL with respect to a SOS. Thus contributing to the development of tools able of ensuring the correctness of realistic concurrent programs. Moreover, given that we used SOS, such tools can be well-integrated in programming environments and even incorporated in compilers.","PeriodicalId":285111,"journal":{"name":"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2015.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present a new soundness proof of Concurrent Separation Logic (CSL) based on a structural operational semantics (SOS). We build on two previous proofs and develop new auxiliary notions to achieve the goal. One uses a denotational semantics (based on traces). The other is based on SOS, but was obtained only for a fragment of the logic - the Disjoint CSL - which disallows modifying shared variables between concurrent threads. In this work, we lift such restriction, proving the soundness of full CSL with respect to a SOS. Thus contributing to the development of tools able of ensuring the correctness of realistic concurrent programs. Moreover, given that we used SOS, such tools can be well-integrated in programming environments and even incorporated in compilers.
回顾并发分离逻辑和操作语义
提出了一种基于结构操作语义(SOS)的并发分离逻辑(CSL)的可靠性证明。我们在前面两个证明的基础上,提出了新的辅助概念来实现这一目标。一种使用指称语义(基于轨迹)。另一个是基于SOS的,但是只获得了逻辑的一个片段——Disjoint CSL——它不允许修改并发线程之间的共享变量。在这项工作中,我们解除了这种限制,证明了完整CSL相对于SOS的合理性。从而有助于开发能够确保实际并发程序正确性的工具。此外,考虑到我们使用了SOS,这些工具可以很好地集成到编程环境中,甚至集成到编译器中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信