The Use of Contextual Teaching and Learning to Teach Reading Comprehension Viewed from Students’ Locus of Control

S. Sunarti, R. H. Puspita
{"title":"The Use of Contextual Teaching and Learning to Teach Reading Comprehension Viewed from Students’ Locus of Control","authors":"S. Sunarti, R. H. Puspita","doi":"10.11648/J.TECS.20190404.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study are to investigate: (1) if CTL is more effective than grammar-translation method to teach reading comprehension; (2) if the students having high locus of control have better reading mastery than those having low locus of control; and (3) if interaction between methods used and students’ locus of control is availavle. The research was conducted at University of Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur. The samples were from two classes, cluster random sampling technique was used. Each class was divided into two groups (the students who have high and low locus of control) in experiment and control class. The techniques used to collect the data were questionnaire and reading comprehension test. The two instruments were tried out to get valid and reliable items. The data were analyzed by using multifactor analysis of ANOVA 2x2 and Tuckey test. The research findings: (1) CTL is more effective than GTM to teach reading comprehension, the result from ANOVA shows that Fo is higher than Ft or Fo > Ft; (2) the reading comprehension of the students who have high locus of control is better than that of those who have low locus of control, the result from ANOVA shows that Fo is higher than Ft or F o > Ft.; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and Locus of control for teaching reading. It’s concluded that teaching methods had a strong influence on students’ reading comprehension.","PeriodicalId":417229,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.TECS.20190404.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aims of this study are to investigate: (1) if CTL is more effective than grammar-translation method to teach reading comprehension; (2) if the students having high locus of control have better reading mastery than those having low locus of control; and (3) if interaction between methods used and students’ locus of control is availavle. The research was conducted at University of Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur. The samples were from two classes, cluster random sampling technique was used. Each class was divided into two groups (the students who have high and low locus of control) in experiment and control class. The techniques used to collect the data were questionnaire and reading comprehension test. The two instruments were tried out to get valid and reliable items. The data were analyzed by using multifactor analysis of ANOVA 2x2 and Tuckey test. The research findings: (1) CTL is more effective than GTM to teach reading comprehension, the result from ANOVA shows that Fo is higher than Ft or Fo > Ft; (2) the reading comprehension of the students who have high locus of control is better than that of those who have low locus of control, the result from ANOVA shows that Fo is higher than Ft or F o > Ft.; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and Locus of control for teaching reading. It’s concluded that teaching methods had a strong influence on students’ reading comprehension.
从学生控制源看语境教学在阅读理解教学中的运用
本研究的目的是探讨:(1)CTL教学法是否比语法翻译教学法更有效地进行阅读理解教学;(2)高控制点学生的阅读掌握水平高于低控制点学生;(3)所使用的方法与学生的控制点之间是否存在交互作用。这项研究是在加里曼丹帖木儿大学进行的。样本分为两类,采用整群随机抽样技术。每个班级分为实验班和控制班两组(高控制点组和低控制点组)。数据收集采用问卷调查和阅读理解测试两种方法。对两种仪器进行了试验,得到了有效可靠的测量结果。采用多因素方差分析2x2和Tuckey检验对资料进行分析。研究发现:(1)CTL对阅读理解的教学效果优于GTM,方差分析结果显示,Fo高于Ft或Fo > Ft;(2)控制点高的学生的阅读理解能力优于控制点低的学生,方差分析结果显示Fo高于Ft或F > Ft;(3)教学方法与阅读控制源之间存在互动关系。结果表明,教学方法对学生的阅读理解有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信