Operating On a Stretcher Is a Safe Alternative to an Operating Room Table

C. Garrett, J. Neal, Brett Lewellyn
{"title":"Operating On a Stretcher Is a Safe Alternative to an Operating Room Table","authors":"C. Garrett, J. Neal, Brett Lewellyn","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-141489/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative and post-operative complication rates for upper extremity surgical cases performed on a standard operating room (OR) table with similar cases done on a typical hospital stretcher. Secondary measures reviewed included surgical time, turnover time, total OR time, blood loss, tourniquet time, and postoperative complications. Methods: Using our institution’s electronic medical record system, we reviewed 100 consecutive upper extremity cases performed on a stretcher as well as 100 consecutive upper extremity cases done on a standard OR table. All cases were performed by the same board certified, fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon. The cases were performed between February of 2014 and May of 2016 at a level one trauma center and its associated outpatient surgical center. Basic univariate statistical analyses were performed, and the two groups were compared for primary and secondary outcome measures. Results: The data showed no significant increase in intraoperative complication rates when operating on a standard hospital stretcher compared to operating on an OR table. There were a total of 6 postoperative complications in the stretcher group and a total of 11 complications in the OR table group. The most common postoperative complication seen in both cohorts was infection. There was one intraoperative complication in the OR table group and none in the stretcher group. With regard to total operating room time, surgical time, and delta time (overall OR room time minus surgical time which was used to calculate the turnover time), we found that the OR table group had shorter times in each category. The total OR time for the OR table group was a mean time of 105 minutes compared to 146 minutes seen in the stretcher group (p= 0.0002). Similarly, there was a shorter mean surgical time for surgeries done on an OR table (73 minutes) when compared to surgeries done on a stretcher (104 minutes) (p = 0.0026). Finally, the average turnover time (delta time) for the OR table group was 32 minutes while the average turnover time for the stretcher group was 42 minutes (p= 0.0002). The average tourniquet time for the OR table group was 36 minutes as compared to 41 in the stretcher group (p=0.467). Conclusion: Operating on a typical hospital stretcher is a safe alternative to operating on a standard operating room table as there was no increased complication rate seen with surgeries performed on a stretcher compared to an OR table.","PeriodicalId":192630,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-141489/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative and post-operative complication rates for upper extremity surgical cases performed on a standard operating room (OR) table with similar cases done on a typical hospital stretcher. Secondary measures reviewed included surgical time, turnover time, total OR time, blood loss, tourniquet time, and postoperative complications. Methods: Using our institution’s electronic medical record system, we reviewed 100 consecutive upper extremity cases performed on a stretcher as well as 100 consecutive upper extremity cases done on a standard OR table. All cases were performed by the same board certified, fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon. The cases were performed between February of 2014 and May of 2016 at a level one trauma center and its associated outpatient surgical center. Basic univariate statistical analyses were performed, and the two groups were compared for primary and secondary outcome measures. Results: The data showed no significant increase in intraoperative complication rates when operating on a standard hospital stretcher compared to operating on an OR table. There were a total of 6 postoperative complications in the stretcher group and a total of 11 complications in the OR table group. The most common postoperative complication seen in both cohorts was infection. There was one intraoperative complication in the OR table group and none in the stretcher group. With regard to total operating room time, surgical time, and delta time (overall OR room time minus surgical time which was used to calculate the turnover time), we found that the OR table group had shorter times in each category. The total OR time for the OR table group was a mean time of 105 minutes compared to 146 minutes seen in the stretcher group (p= 0.0002). Similarly, there was a shorter mean surgical time for surgeries done on an OR table (73 minutes) when compared to surgeries done on a stretcher (104 minutes) (p = 0.0026). Finally, the average turnover time (delta time) for the OR table group was 32 minutes while the average turnover time for the stretcher group was 42 minutes (p= 0.0002). The average tourniquet time for the OR table group was 36 minutes as compared to 41 in the stretcher group (p=0.467). Conclusion: Operating on a typical hospital stretcher is a safe alternative to operating on a standard operating room table as there was no increased complication rate seen with surgeries performed on a stretcher compared to an OR table.
在担架上做手术比在手术台上做手术更安全
目的:本研究的主要目的是比较在标准手术室(OR)手术台上进行的上肢手术病例与在典型医院担架上进行的类似病例的术中和术后并发症发生率。次要指标包括手术时间、周转时间、总手术室时间、出血量、止血带时间和术后并发症。方法:利用我院的电子病历系统,我们回顾了100例在担架上连续上肢手术和100例在标准手术台上连续上肢手术的病例。所有病例均由同一委员会认证,奖学金培训的骨科医生进行。病例于2014年2月至2016年5月在一级创伤中心及其相关门诊外科中心进行。进行了基本的单变量统计分析,并比较了两组的主要和次要结局指标。结果:数据显示,在标准医院担架上手术与在手术台上手术相比,术中并发症发生率无显著增加。担架组术后并发症共6例,手术台组术后并发症共11例。两组患者中最常见的术后并发症是感染。手术台组术中并发症1例,担架组无并发症。关于总手术室时间、手术时间和delta时间(总手术室时间减去用于计算周转时间的手术时间),我们发现OR表组在每个类别中的时间都更短。手术台组的总手术时间平均为105分钟,而担架组为146分钟(p= 0.0002)。同样,在手术台上进行手术的平均手术时间(73分钟)比在担架上进行手术(104分钟)更短(p = 0.0026)。最后,手术台组的平均翻身时间(delta time)为32分钟,担架组的平均翻身时间为42分钟(p= 0.0002)。手术台组的平均止血带时间为36分钟,而担架组为41分钟(p=0.467)。结论:在典型的医院担架上进行手术比在标准手术室手术台上进行手术更安全,因为与在手术室手术台上进行手术相比,在担架上进行手术的并发症发生率没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信