A scoping review of community-based geriatric assessment and screening tools used in South Asia

Sucharita Panigraghi, T. Bhoi, S. Pati, J. Kshatri
{"title":"A scoping review of community-based geriatric assessment and screening tools used in South Asia","authors":"Sucharita Panigraghi, T. Bhoi, S. Pati, J. Kshatri","doi":"10.4103/jiag.jiag_1_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Home-based comprehensive assessment and integrated care of the older people could be a key to relieve the pressure on the already overburdened health system. This review summarizes evidence on validated community-based geriatric assessment tools in South Asia. Methods: Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, a total of 46 studies were included in the scoping review after searching from electronic databases and reference lists using the predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted on the main characteristics of included studies, identified instruments, and their psychometric properties of the tools. This review was reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses-ScR guidelines. Results: Among the 46 included studies, 10 reported on instruments for medical assessment, 12 on tools for psychological conditions, 13 on tools for functional issues, 2 on social well-being, and 9 on tools with multiple domains of health. Most studies included participants from both gender and different social classes. Majority used measurements that were both self-reported or measured by the investigator, whereas only two instruments were designed to be used by clinicians. In the existing geriatric health assessment tools, environmental domain was neglected completely, and not a single tool considered in this review covered all 5 domains which influence regular life of the elderly. Conclusion: There are no validated tools available that can be used for comprehensive geriatric assessment in South Asia. There is a need to develop and validate culturally sensitive tools that can be used for assessing all the geriatric health domains.","PeriodicalId":350641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiag.jiag_1_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Home-based comprehensive assessment and integrated care of the older people could be a key to relieve the pressure on the already overburdened health system. This review summarizes evidence on validated community-based geriatric assessment tools in South Asia. Methods: Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, a total of 46 studies were included in the scoping review after searching from electronic databases and reference lists using the predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted on the main characteristics of included studies, identified instruments, and their psychometric properties of the tools. This review was reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses-ScR guidelines. Results: Among the 46 included studies, 10 reported on instruments for medical assessment, 12 on tools for psychological conditions, 13 on tools for functional issues, 2 on social well-being, and 9 on tools with multiple domains of health. Most studies included participants from both gender and different social classes. Majority used measurements that were both self-reported or measured by the investigator, whereas only two instruments were designed to be used by clinicians. In the existing geriatric health assessment tools, environmental domain was neglected completely, and not a single tool considered in this review covered all 5 domains which influence regular life of the elderly. Conclusion: There are no validated tools available that can be used for comprehensive geriatric assessment in South Asia. There is a need to develop and validate culturally sensitive tools that can be used for assessing all the geriatric health domains.
对南亚使用的社区老年评估和筛查工具进行范围审查
背景:以家庭为基础的老年人综合评估和综合护理可能是减轻已经负担过重的卫生系统压力的关键。本综述总结了南亚有效的社区老年评估工具的证据。方法:在Arksey和O'Malley的五阶段范围评价框架的指导下,使用预先确定的资格标准从电子数据库和参考文献列表中检索,共纳入46项研究。从纳入研究的主要特征、确定的工具及其工具的心理测量特性中提取数据。本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析- scr指南的首选报告项目进行报道。结果:在纳入的46项研究中,10项报告了医疗评估工具,12项报告了心理状况工具,13项报告了功能问题工具,2项报告了社会福祉工具,9项报告了涉及多个健康领域的工具。大多数研究都包括来自性别和不同社会阶层的参与者。大多数使用了自我报告或由研究者测量的测量方法,而只有两种仪器被设计为临床医生使用。在现有的老年健康评估工具中,环境领域被完全忽视,在本综述中考虑的工具中没有一个涵盖所有影响老年人正常生活的5个领域。结论:在南亚没有有效的工具可用于全面的老年评估。有必要开发和验证可用于评估所有老年保健领域的文化敏感工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信