Comparison of Far Infrared Radiation and Warm Water Immersion on Recovery After Submaximal Physical Activity

E. S. Wahjuni, Arifah Kaharina, Afifan Yulfadinata, Idzam Kholid Akbar
{"title":"Comparison of Far Infrared Radiation and Warm Water Immersion on Recovery After Submaximal Physical Activity","authors":"E. S. Wahjuni, Arifah Kaharina, Afifan Yulfadinata, Idzam Kholid Akbar","doi":"10.2991/acpes-19.2019.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— Recovery is an attempt to make the body recover after physical training. Passive recovery includes Far Infrared Radiation (FIR) and Warm Water Immersion (WWI), but the two recoveries are not well known. The aims of this study were to test the the efficacy of FIR, WWI, and Passive (PAS) modalities in decreasing blood lactic acid levels (BLAL) as an indirect marker of muscle fatigue after submaximal intensity physical activity. This is a randomized pretest-posttest control group research. The subject were 21 male students at the UNESA Sports Science Faculty aged 18-23 years. They were assigned three different recovery modalities (FIR, WWI, PAS) in a random order. Subjects were treated with submaximal physical activity (85% maximal heart rate) with ergocycle. BLAL was assessed immediately after physical activity (pre), and after 15 minutes the tested (post). There was a significant decrease in BLAL from the three groups after recovery. The results of different tests (p <0.05) showed a significant difference between ∆FIR and ∆PAS (p=0.006), no differences between ∆WWI and ∆PAS (p=0,082), no differences between ∆FIR and ∆WWI (p=0,692). It can be concluded that the reduction in BLAL was greater in the FIR group than in the WWI and PAS groups.","PeriodicalId":247372,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Physical Education, Sport, and Health (ACPES 2019)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Physical Education, Sport, and Health (ACPES 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/acpes-19.2019.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— Recovery is an attempt to make the body recover after physical training. Passive recovery includes Far Infrared Radiation (FIR) and Warm Water Immersion (WWI), but the two recoveries are not well known. The aims of this study were to test the the efficacy of FIR, WWI, and Passive (PAS) modalities in decreasing blood lactic acid levels (BLAL) as an indirect marker of muscle fatigue after submaximal intensity physical activity. This is a randomized pretest-posttest control group research. The subject were 21 male students at the UNESA Sports Science Faculty aged 18-23 years. They were assigned three different recovery modalities (FIR, WWI, PAS) in a random order. Subjects were treated with submaximal physical activity (85% maximal heart rate) with ergocycle. BLAL was assessed immediately after physical activity (pre), and after 15 minutes the tested (post). There was a significant decrease in BLAL from the three groups after recovery. The results of different tests (p <0.05) showed a significant difference between ∆FIR and ∆PAS (p=0.006), no differences between ∆WWI and ∆PAS (p=0,082), no differences between ∆FIR and ∆WWI (p=0,692). It can be concluded that the reduction in BLAL was greater in the FIR group than in the WWI and PAS groups.
远红外线辐射与温水浸泡对亚极限运动后恢复的比较
恢复是指在体能训练后使身体恢复的尝试。被动回收包括远红外辐射(FIR)和温水浸泡(WWI),但这两种回收方法并不为人所知。本研究的目的是测试FIR, WWI和被动(PAS)模式在降低血乳酸水平(BLAL)方面的功效,BLAL是亚最大强度体力活动后肌肉疲劳的间接标志。这是一个随机的前测后测对照组研究。研究对象是联合国esa体育科学学院年龄在18-23岁的21名男学生。他们被随机分配了三种不同的恢复方式(FIR, WWI, PAS)。受试者接受亚最大体力活动(85%最大心率)和ergocycle治疗。体力活动后立即(前)和测试后15分钟(后)评估BLAL。三组患者恢复后BLAL均显著降低。不同试验结果(p <0.05)显示,∆FIR与∆PAS之间差异显著(p=0.006),∆WWI与∆PAS之间无差异(p= 0.082),∆FIR与∆WWI之间无差异(p= 0.692)。由此可见,与WWI和PAS组相比,FIR组的BLAL降低幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信