Assessing Cognitive Test Performance Using Automatic Digital Pen Features Analysis

Alexander Prange, Daniel Sonntag
{"title":"Assessing Cognitive Test Performance Using Automatic Digital Pen Features Analysis","authors":"Alexander Prange, Daniel Sonntag","doi":"10.1145/3450613.3456812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most cognitive assessments, for dementia screening for example, are conducted with a pen on normal paper. We record these tests with a digital pen as part of a new interactive cognitive assessment tool with automatic analysis of pen input. The clinician can, first, observe the sketching process in real-time on a mobile tablet, e.g., in telemedicine settings or to follow Covid-19 distancing regulations. Second, the results of an automatic test analysis are presented to the clinician in real-time, thereby reducing manual scoring effort and producing objective reports. The presented research describes the architecture of our cognitive assessment tool and examines how accurately different machine learning (ML) models can automatically score cognitive tests, without a semantic content analysis. Our system uses a set of more than 170 pen features, calculated directly from the raw digital pen signal. We evaluate our system with 40 subjects from a geriatrics daycare clinic. Using standard ML techniques our feature set outperforms previous approaches on the cognitive tests we consider, i.e., the Clock Drawing, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, and the Trail Making Test, by automatically scoring tests with up to 82% accuracy in a binary classification task.","PeriodicalId":435674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3450613.3456812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Most cognitive assessments, for dementia screening for example, are conducted with a pen on normal paper. We record these tests with a digital pen as part of a new interactive cognitive assessment tool with automatic analysis of pen input. The clinician can, first, observe the sketching process in real-time on a mobile tablet, e.g., in telemedicine settings or to follow Covid-19 distancing regulations. Second, the results of an automatic test analysis are presented to the clinician in real-time, thereby reducing manual scoring effort and producing objective reports. The presented research describes the architecture of our cognitive assessment tool and examines how accurately different machine learning (ML) models can automatically score cognitive tests, without a semantic content analysis. Our system uses a set of more than 170 pen features, calculated directly from the raw digital pen signal. We evaluate our system with 40 subjects from a geriatrics daycare clinic. Using standard ML techniques our feature set outperforms previous approaches on the cognitive tests we consider, i.e., the Clock Drawing, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, and the Trail Making Test, by automatically scoring tests with up to 82% accuracy in a binary classification task.
使用自动数字笔特征分析评估认知测试表现
大多数认知评估,例如痴呆症筛查,都是用笔在普通纸上进行的。我们用数字笔记录这些测试,作为一种新的交互式认知评估工具的一部分,该工具具有笔输入的自动分析。首先,临床医生可以在移动平板电脑上实时观察素描过程,例如在远程医疗环境中或遵守Covid-19距离规定。其次,自动测试分析的结果实时呈现给临床医生,从而减少人工评分工作并生成客观报告。本研究描述了我们的认知评估工具的架构,并检查了在没有语义内容分析的情况下,不同的机器学习(ML)模型如何准确地自动为认知测试评分。我们的系统使用了一套超过170笔的特征,直接从原始数字笔信号计算。我们用一家老年日间护理诊所的40名受试者来评估我们的系统。使用标准的机器学习技术,我们的特征集在我们考虑的认知测试中优于以前的方法,即时钟绘制,Rey-Osterrieth复杂图形和轨迹制作测试,在二元分类任务中自动评分测试的准确率高达82%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信