Evaluating the Impact of Frac Communication Between Parent, Child, and Vertical Wells in the Midland Basin Lower Spraberry and Wolfcamp Reservoirs

R. Scherz, M. Rainbolt, Y. Pradhan, Wei Tian
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Frac Communication Between Parent, Child, and Vertical Wells in the Midland Basin Lower Spraberry and Wolfcamp Reservoirs","authors":"R. Scherz, M. Rainbolt, Y. Pradhan, Wei Tian","doi":"10.2118/194349-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the Midland Basin, infill wells have high potential of experiencing well-to-well fracture interference or \"frac hits\". Rock stress alteration around parent wells affect child fracture interactions thus impacting completion effectiveness, well productivity, and well spacing. Endeavor Energy Resources (EER) had a unique opportunity to study parent (hereafter referred to as primary) and child (hereafter referred as infill or active well) interactions and the effects of producing vertical wells on fracture behavior. Two active horizontal wells cross both developed and undeveloped acreage where half of each well is an infill between existing horizontals and the other half is in undeveloped acreage with two existing vertical wells. Operation-driven fracture fluid movement was analyzed by monitoring the treating pressure of the two active wells being completed; and the pressure response of nine shut-in offset horizontals, and ten vertical wells. The measurements and analysis establish a base case to which future fracture- interference monitoring techniques will be compared and later mitigation and intervention.\n Primary horizontal wells offsetting two infill wells were monitored with wellhead pressure sensors and ESP downhole pressure sensors. Two vertical observation wells (VOW) between the new infill wells were fitted with wellhead wireless pressure sensors and bottomhole pressure gauges. During this area's original development in 2016, vertical wells located hundreds to thousands of feet from the active fraccing well experienced frac interaction. To measure the severity of the invasive fluid movement, wellhead sensors were installed on vertical wells one-half mile, one mile, and one- and-a-half miles away from the active wells. Water and oil tracers were used in the two active infill wells to study fracture fluid movement in conjunction with pressure data.\n In the unexploited section, the observation horizontal wells’ pressure responses were examined for fracture shadowing (inter-well poro-elastic response) stress shadowing (intra-well dynamic active fracture interactions (DAFI) (Daneshy, 2018), and fracture-to-fracture connections both temporary and long term. As fracture operations approached a primary vertical well (depleted zones), frac fluid was distributed vertically among multiple horizons through perforations in the existing well and laterally into horizontal primary wells. The three laterally closest primary wells, completed in three different intervals, had similar strong pressure responses to a common active stage suggesting a geologic cause. As for the vertical observation wells, fluid incursion was observed over 8400 feet away. The vertical wells between the two horizontal active infills had a 200 ft. to 400 ft. radius of pressure disturbance as the frac stages approached their locations. Fracture stages within the 200 ft. to 400 ft. radius caused direct hits while stages outside this radius caused mild pressure increases identified as fracture shadows.\n Legacy fields in Midland Basin are usually Held by Production (HBP). Consequently, horizontal development may be around existing vertical wells. Redevelopment of acreage into unexploited benches after primary benches have been horizontally developed is another situation many companies face. By sharing this case study, the authors want other operators who are facing these common issues to leverage these learnings. The significance of ignoring potential fracture interference and hydraulic connection may result in ineffective fractures, reduced stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), or wells sharing SRV. Ultimately this means reduced resource recovery which may occur in either or both the primary and infill wells.","PeriodicalId":103693,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194349-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the Midland Basin, infill wells have high potential of experiencing well-to-well fracture interference or "frac hits". Rock stress alteration around parent wells affect child fracture interactions thus impacting completion effectiveness, well productivity, and well spacing. Endeavor Energy Resources (EER) had a unique opportunity to study parent (hereafter referred to as primary) and child (hereafter referred as infill or active well) interactions and the effects of producing vertical wells on fracture behavior. Two active horizontal wells cross both developed and undeveloped acreage where half of each well is an infill between existing horizontals and the other half is in undeveloped acreage with two existing vertical wells. Operation-driven fracture fluid movement was analyzed by monitoring the treating pressure of the two active wells being completed; and the pressure response of nine shut-in offset horizontals, and ten vertical wells. The measurements and analysis establish a base case to which future fracture- interference monitoring techniques will be compared and later mitigation and intervention. Primary horizontal wells offsetting two infill wells were monitored with wellhead pressure sensors and ESP downhole pressure sensors. Two vertical observation wells (VOW) between the new infill wells were fitted with wellhead wireless pressure sensors and bottomhole pressure gauges. During this area's original development in 2016, vertical wells located hundreds to thousands of feet from the active fraccing well experienced frac interaction. To measure the severity of the invasive fluid movement, wellhead sensors were installed on vertical wells one-half mile, one mile, and one- and-a-half miles away from the active wells. Water and oil tracers were used in the two active infill wells to study fracture fluid movement in conjunction with pressure data. In the unexploited section, the observation horizontal wells’ pressure responses were examined for fracture shadowing (inter-well poro-elastic response) stress shadowing (intra-well dynamic active fracture interactions (DAFI) (Daneshy, 2018), and fracture-to-fracture connections both temporary and long term. As fracture operations approached a primary vertical well (depleted zones), frac fluid was distributed vertically among multiple horizons through perforations in the existing well and laterally into horizontal primary wells. The three laterally closest primary wells, completed in three different intervals, had similar strong pressure responses to a common active stage suggesting a geologic cause. As for the vertical observation wells, fluid incursion was observed over 8400 feet away. The vertical wells between the two horizontal active infills had a 200 ft. to 400 ft. radius of pressure disturbance as the frac stages approached their locations. Fracture stages within the 200 ft. to 400 ft. radius caused direct hits while stages outside this radius caused mild pressure increases identified as fracture shadows. Legacy fields in Midland Basin are usually Held by Production (HBP). Consequently, horizontal development may be around existing vertical wells. Redevelopment of acreage into unexploited benches after primary benches have been horizontally developed is another situation many companies face. By sharing this case study, the authors want other operators who are facing these common issues to leverage these learnings. The significance of ignoring potential fracture interference and hydraulic connection may result in ineffective fractures, reduced stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), or wells sharing SRV. Ultimately this means reduced resource recovery which may occur in either or both the primary and infill wells.
Midland盆地下部Spraberry和Wolfcamp油藏主、子、直井压裂连通性影响评价
在米德兰盆地,充填井发生井间裂缝干扰或“裂缝冲击”的可能性很大。母井周围的岩石应力变化会影响子裂缝的相互作用,从而影响完井效率、井产能和井距。Endeavor Energy Resources (EER)有一个独特的机会来研究母井(以下称为主井)和子井(以下称为填充井或活动井)的相互作用,以及生产直井对裂缝行为的影响。两个活跃的水平井穿过已开发区域和未开发区域,其中每口井的一半是在现有水平段之间的填充,另一半是在未开发区域,有两个现有的直井。通过监测两口正在完井的处理压力,分析了作业驱动的压裂液运动;9口关井邻井水平井和10口直井的压力响应。这些测量和分析为将来的裂缝干扰监测技术以及后续的缓解和干预奠定了基础。利用井口压力传感器和ESP井下压力传感器对相邻两口充填井的主水平井进行监测。新填充井之间的两口垂直观测井(VOW)安装了井口无线压力传感器和井底压力计。在2016年该地区最初的开发过程中,距离主动跟踪井数百至数千英尺的直井经历了压裂相互作用。为了测量侵入性流体运动的严重程度,井口传感器被安装在距离活动井1.5英里、1英里和1.5英里的直井上。水示踪剂和油示踪剂被用于两口活跃的填充井中,结合压力数据研究压裂液的运动。在未开发段,对观察水平井的压力响应进行了裂缝阴影(井间孔隙弹性响应)、应力阴影(井内动态主动裂缝相互作用(DAFI)) (Daneshy, 2018)以及裂缝间的临时和长期连接。当压裂作业接近主直井(枯竭区)时,压裂液通过现有井的射孔垂直分布在多个层位,并横向分布到水平主井中。在三个不同的井段完成的三口横向距离最近的主井,在一个共同的活动阶段有相似的强烈压力响应,这表明有地质原因。在垂直观察井中,在8400英尺处观察到流体侵入。在两个水平活动充填体之间的直井,当压裂段接近它们的位置时,压力扰动半径为200英尺至400英尺。在200 ~ 400英尺半径范围内的压裂段会产生直接冲击,而在此半径之外的压裂段会产生轻微的压力增加,即裂缝阴影。Midland盆地的遗留油田通常由生产(HBP)持有。因此,水平开发可能围绕现有的直井进行。许多公司面临的另一种情况是,在初级油田水平开发后,将土地重新开发成未开发的油田。通过分享这个案例研究,作者希望其他面临这些共同问题的运营商能够利用这些学习。忽视潜在裂缝干扰和水力连接的重要性可能导致裂缝无效,降低增产储层体积(SRV),或井共用SRV。最终,这意味着资源采收率降低,这可能发生在主井和填充井中,也可能同时发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信