Scope of Claims Supplementary to Rei Vindicatio in the Polish and German Law: Analysis and Comparative Remarks

Anna Kledyńska
{"title":"Scope of Claims Supplementary to Rei Vindicatio in the Polish and German Law: Analysis and Comparative Remarks","authors":"Anna Kledyńska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to present the regulations on supplementary claims applicable under the Polish and German law. The concept of supplementary claims under the Polish law refers to claims regulated in Articles 224 to 225 of the Polish Civil Code. Under German law, the core of the regulations governing the types and scope of these claims is contained in the text of §§ 987 to 993 of the BGB. On the grounds of both the analysed legal orders, one can notice numerous similarities regarding the way these claims are shaped. The most fundamental is the desire to provide increased protection for the good faith possessor and to tighten the liability of the person in possession of the thing, who is already aware of a vindicatory action against them or is in bad faith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the analysis of the solutions for supplementary claims also allows us to see significant differences, expressed primarily in the much more comprehensive regulation of the issue in question in the German law. The article offers a comparative legal analysis of the solutions functioning on the grounds of both these legal orders and conclusions.\n\n","PeriodicalId":403517,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the regulations on supplementary claims applicable under the Polish and German law. The concept of supplementary claims under the Polish law refers to claims regulated in Articles 224 to 225 of the Polish Civil Code. Under German law, the core of the regulations governing the types and scope of these claims is contained in the text of §§ 987 to 993 of the BGB. On the grounds of both the analysed legal orders, one can notice numerous similarities regarding the way these claims are shaped. The most fundamental is the desire to provide increased protection for the good faith possessor and to tighten the liability of the person in possession of the thing, who is already aware of a vindicatory action against them or is in bad faith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the analysis of the solutions for supplementary claims also allows us to see significant differences, expressed primarily in the much more comprehensive regulation of the issue in question in the German law. The article offers a comparative legal analysis of the solutions functioning on the grounds of both these legal orders and conclusions.
波兰和德国法律中补充抗辩的索赔范围:分析与比较
本文的目的是介绍根据波兰和德国法律适用的补充索赔条例。波兰法律规定的补充索赔概念是指《波兰民法典》第224至225条规定的索赔。根据德国法律,管理这些权利要求的类型和范围的法规的核心包含在BGB§§987至993的文本中。根据所分析的两种法律秩序,人们可以注意到这些主张的形成方式有许多相似之处。最根本的是希望为善意的占有人提供更多的保护,并加强已经知道对他们采取报复行动或恶意占有物品的人的责任。尽管有上述情况,对补充权利要求的解决办法的分析也使我们看到重大差异,主要表现在德国法律对有关问题的更全面的规定。本文对基于这两种法律秩序和结论的解决办法进行了比较法律分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信