DIFFERENCES IN CHILDREN EMOTIONAL VALENCE RATINGS OF WORDS AND PICTURES

Johanne Belmon, Magali Noyer-Martin, Sandra Jhean-Larose
{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN CHILDREN EMOTIONAL VALENCE RATINGS OF WORDS AND PICTURES","authors":"Johanne Belmon, Magali Noyer-Martin, Sandra Jhean-Larose","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Words and pictures stimuli are often used in study of perception, language, and memory. More and more studies are being done on how emotional words or pictures influence different cognitive processing. However, the emotional rating process of these stimuli has rarely been studied in young children. Especially, no study has investigated emotional rating process on pre-schoolers. This research examines how young children process emotional words and pictures stimuli. More precisely, we measured age (4, 5, and 6-years-old) and sex differences (girls and boys) in emotional valence rating of pictures and words. A corpus of 90 words and 90 pictures was selected from among the emotional databases compiled by Alario & Ferrand (1999), Bonin et al. (2003), Cannard et al. (2006) Syssau & Monnier (2009). This corpus was rated by 92 French children (28 four-years-old children, 16 girls and 12 boys; 34 five-years-old children, 14 girls and 20 boys; and 30 six-years-old children, 13 girls and 17 boys). These ratings were made using a three points emotional valence rating scale (negative, neutral, and positive) based on AEJE scale (Largy, 2018). To keep the rating task simple for the children, the scale labels were using drawings of faces. The 90 Words and 90 pictures were divided in sets of 15 stimuli. Each child rated all sets of stimuli in separate sessions. These sessions were in a random order between words and pictures stimuli sets. Good response reliability was observed in the three age groups. We assessed age differences in the valence ratings: Four-year-old children shown lower mean scores in valence rating (positive, neutral, and negative) than did five-year-old ones who shown lower mean scores in valence rating than did six-year-old ones. Despite a lack of consensus in the literature, we found sex differences in the valence ratings. Girls in each age groups shown higher mean scores in valence rating than did boys. Moreover, results shown a significant difference between pictures and words ratings. Children better rated words than pictures in each age group and sex. Besides, analyses revealed significant differences in emotional valence rating between negative, neutral, and positive words and pictures stimuli. Positive words and pictures stimuli were better rated by children than negative ones which were better rated than neutral ones. Future research will compile this corpus in a database, and it could become a worthwhile tool to control emotional verbal and visual stimuli in experimental design for children.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Words and pictures stimuli are often used in study of perception, language, and memory. More and more studies are being done on how emotional words or pictures influence different cognitive processing. However, the emotional rating process of these stimuli has rarely been studied in young children. Especially, no study has investigated emotional rating process on pre-schoolers. This research examines how young children process emotional words and pictures stimuli. More precisely, we measured age (4, 5, and 6-years-old) and sex differences (girls and boys) in emotional valence rating of pictures and words. A corpus of 90 words and 90 pictures was selected from among the emotional databases compiled by Alario & Ferrand (1999), Bonin et al. (2003), Cannard et al. (2006) Syssau & Monnier (2009). This corpus was rated by 92 French children (28 four-years-old children, 16 girls and 12 boys; 34 five-years-old children, 14 girls and 20 boys; and 30 six-years-old children, 13 girls and 17 boys). These ratings were made using a three points emotional valence rating scale (negative, neutral, and positive) based on AEJE scale (Largy, 2018). To keep the rating task simple for the children, the scale labels were using drawings of faces. The 90 Words and 90 pictures were divided in sets of 15 stimuli. Each child rated all sets of stimuli in separate sessions. These sessions were in a random order between words and pictures stimuli sets. Good response reliability was observed in the three age groups. We assessed age differences in the valence ratings: Four-year-old children shown lower mean scores in valence rating (positive, neutral, and negative) than did five-year-old ones who shown lower mean scores in valence rating than did six-year-old ones. Despite a lack of consensus in the literature, we found sex differences in the valence ratings. Girls in each age groups shown higher mean scores in valence rating than did boys. Moreover, results shown a significant difference between pictures and words ratings. Children better rated words than pictures in each age group and sex. Besides, analyses revealed significant differences in emotional valence rating between negative, neutral, and positive words and pictures stimuli. Positive words and pictures stimuli were better rated by children than negative ones which were better rated than neutral ones. Future research will compile this corpus in a database, and it could become a worthwhile tool to control emotional verbal and visual stimuli in experimental design for children."
儿童对文字和图片的情绪效价评定的差异
文字和图片刺激通常用于研究感知、语言和记忆。越来越多的研究是关于情感词汇或图片如何影响不同的认知过程。然而,这些刺激的情绪评定过程很少在幼儿中进行研究。尤其是对学龄前儿童的情绪评价过程,尚无相关研究。这项研究考察了幼儿如何处理情感词汇和图片刺激。更准确地说,我们测量了年龄(4岁、5岁和6岁)和性别差异(女孩和男孩)对图片和文字的情感效价评价。从Alario & Ferrand(1999)、Bonin et al.(2003)、Cannard et al.(2006)、Syssau & Monnier(2009)编制的情感数据库中选择90个单词和90张图片作为语料库。该语料库由92名法国儿童(28名4岁儿童,16名女孩和12名男孩;34名5岁儿童,14名女孩,20名男孩;30个6岁的孩子,13个女孩,17个男孩)。这些评分是使用基于AEJE量表(Largy, 2018)的三点情绪效价评定量表(消极、中性和积极)进行的。为了让孩子们的评定任务简单,量表标签使用了人脸图。这90个单词和90张图片被分成15组刺激。每个孩子在不同的环节中对所有的刺激进行打分。这些会话在单词和图片刺激组之间是随机顺序的。在三个年龄组中观察到良好的反应信度。我们评估了效价评定的年龄差异:四岁儿童的效价评定(阳性、中性和阴性)平均得分低于五岁儿童,而五岁儿童的效价评定平均得分低于六岁儿童。尽管在文献中缺乏共识,但我们发现在效价评分中存在性别差异。在每个年龄组中,女孩的平均分都高于男孩。此外,结果显示图片和文字评分之间存在显著差异。在各个年龄组和性别中,儿童对文字的评分都高于对图片的评分。此外,分析还发现消极、中性和积极的文字和图片刺激在情绪效价评定上存在显著差异。儿童对积极的文字和图片刺激的评价高于消极的,消极的评价高于中性的。未来的研究将把这个语料库汇编成一个数据库,它可能成为一个有价值的工具,在儿童实验设计中控制情感、语言和视觉刺激。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信