{"title":"Comparison of eye-tracking data with physiological signals for estimating level of understanding","authors":"Masaki Omata, Masaya Iuchi, Megumi Sakiyama","doi":"10.1145/3292147.3292233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an e-learning content recommendation system that estimates a learner's level of understanding of a second language sentence. The system analyzes the eye-tracking data of a learner reading a text, and automatically selects the next text based on the estimation. This paper describes the system design and experimentally compares the estimation accuracies of two estimation methods (multiple regression and a neural network) and two kinds of learner-response data (eye-tracking data alone and both eye-tracking data and physiological signals). The neural network achieved higher accuracy than multiple regression, and eye-tracking data alone yielded the same or higher accuracy than the combined eye-tracking and physiological data. The average accuracy rate of the neural network using eye-tracking data was 67.86%.1","PeriodicalId":309502,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
We propose an e-learning content recommendation system that estimates a learner's level of understanding of a second language sentence. The system analyzes the eye-tracking data of a learner reading a text, and automatically selects the next text based on the estimation. This paper describes the system design and experimentally compares the estimation accuracies of two estimation methods (multiple regression and a neural network) and two kinds of learner-response data (eye-tracking data alone and both eye-tracking data and physiological signals). The neural network achieved higher accuracy than multiple regression, and eye-tracking data alone yielded the same or higher accuracy than the combined eye-tracking and physiological data. The average accuracy rate of the neural network using eye-tracking data was 67.86%.1