Characterising Sustainability Requirements: A New Species Red Herring or Just an Odd Fish?

C. C. Venters, N. Seyff, Christoph Becker, Stefanie Betz, R. Chitchyan, L. Duboc, D. McIntyre, B. Penzenstadler
{"title":"Characterising Sustainability Requirements: A New Species Red Herring or Just an Odd Fish?","authors":"C. C. Venters, N. Seyff, Christoph Becker, Stefanie Betz, R. Chitchyan, L. Duboc, D. McIntyre, B. Penzenstadler","doi":"10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2017.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements articulating the needs of stakeholdersare critical to successful system development and key to influencingtheir long-term effects. As the concept of sustainabilityhas entered the discourse of a number of software-relatedcomputing fields, so has the term 'sustainability requirement'.However, it is unclear whether sustainability requirements areand should be different from how we already understand softwarerequirements. This paper presents the results of a corpusassisteddiscourse analysis study that explored the concept ofsustainability requirements in order to understand how theterm is being used in software and requirements engineeringand related fields. The results of this study reveal that theterm 'sustainability requirement' is generally used ambiguouslyand reveals significant segmentation across different fields. Ourdetailed analysis of selected influential papers highlights thesegmented use of the term and suggests key focus questionsthat need to be addressed to establish a shared operativeunderstanding of the term.","PeriodicalId":322017,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society Track (ICSE-SEIS)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society Track (ICSE-SEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2017.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Requirements articulating the needs of stakeholdersare critical to successful system development and key to influencingtheir long-term effects. As the concept of sustainabilityhas entered the discourse of a number of software-relatedcomputing fields, so has the term 'sustainability requirement'.However, it is unclear whether sustainability requirements areand should be different from how we already understand softwarerequirements. This paper presents the results of a corpusassisteddiscourse analysis study that explored the concept ofsustainability requirements in order to understand how theterm is being used in software and requirements engineeringand related fields. The results of this study reveal that theterm 'sustainability requirement' is generally used ambiguouslyand reveals significant segmentation across different fields. Ourdetailed analysis of selected influential papers highlights thesegmented use of the term and suggests key focus questionsthat need to be addressed to establish a shared operativeunderstanding of the term.
可持续发展要求的特征:红鲱鱼新品种还是一种奇怪的鱼?
阐明涉众需求的需求是成功的系统开发的关键,也是影响涉众长期影响的关键。随着可持续性的概念进入许多与软件相关的计算领域的话语,“可持续性要求”一词也进入了话语。然而,目前尚不清楚可持续性需求是否应该与我们已经理解的软件需求不同。本文介绍了一项corpusassiddiscourse analysis研究的结果,该研究探索了可持续性需求的概念,以了解该术语如何在软件和需求工程及相关领域中使用。本研究的结果表明,术语“可持续性要求”通常使用含糊不清,并揭示了在不同领域的显著分割。我们对选定的有影响力的论文进行了详细的分析,突出了该术语的分段使用,并提出了需要解决的关键焦点问题,以建立对该术语的共同操作理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信