Synchronous speech and semantic incongruity: what do outliers tell us about it?

Veronica P. Siqueira, B. Medeiros
{"title":"Synchronous speech and semantic incongruity: what do outliers tell us about it?","authors":"Veronica P. Siqueira, B. Medeiros","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synchronous speech, considered to be an easily performed task, is investigated in two experimental conditions designated as original (OC) and altered (AC), with focus on the outliers’ behavior. The hypothesis raised is that AC, which offers semantic incongruities, would lead individuals to a poorer synchronization performance, i.e, producing greater lag duration. Divided equally in two groups (A and B), 24 dyads were recorded reading two fables in Brazilian Portuguese, in both original and altered conditions. Asynchrony duration was obtained by extracting the lag between vowel onsets, after aligning speakers’ waveforms in each dyad. Considering results related to the entire dataset, speakers are able to synchronize in both conditions (OC and AC). However, a great number of outliers was observed throughout the dataset. Its distribution in AC is significantly different from the distribution in OC, the former showing greater values for both variance and mean. In this exploratory study, one promising explanation for these results will be discussed taking into account aspects such as the outliers’ location throughout the text. These initial results prompt further investigation, in order to verify a more accurate relation between the outliers’ duration and the semantic incongruities' place of occurrence.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synchronous speech, considered to be an easily performed task, is investigated in two experimental conditions designated as original (OC) and altered (AC), with focus on the outliers’ behavior. The hypothesis raised is that AC, which offers semantic incongruities, would lead individuals to a poorer synchronization performance, i.e, producing greater lag duration. Divided equally in two groups (A and B), 24 dyads were recorded reading two fables in Brazilian Portuguese, in both original and altered conditions. Asynchrony duration was obtained by extracting the lag between vowel onsets, after aligning speakers’ waveforms in each dyad. Considering results related to the entire dataset, speakers are able to synchronize in both conditions (OC and AC). However, a great number of outliers was observed throughout the dataset. Its distribution in AC is significantly different from the distribution in OC, the former showing greater values for both variance and mean. In this exploratory study, one promising explanation for these results will be discussed taking into account aspects such as the outliers’ location throughout the text. These initial results prompt further investigation, in order to verify a more accurate relation between the outliers’ duration and the semantic incongruities' place of occurrence.
同步语音和语义不一致:异常值告诉我们什么?
同步语音被认为是一项容易完成的任务,在原始(OC)和改变(AC)两种实验条件下进行了研究,重点关注了异常值的行为。提出的假设是,AC提供语义不一致,会导致个体的同步性能较差,即产生更长的滞后时间。将24对男女平均分成两组(A组和B组),分别在原始条件和改变条件下用巴西葡萄牙语阅读两个寓言。异步持续时间是通过提取元音开始之间的滞后来获得的,在对齐每个对偶的说话人的波形后。考虑到与整个数据集相关的结果,扬声器能够在两种条件下(OC和AC)同步。然而,在整个数据集中观察到大量的异常值。其在AC中的分布与OC中的分布有显著差异,前者的方差和均值都较大。在这项探索性研究中,将讨论这些结果的一个有希望的解释,同时考虑到整个文本中异常值的位置等方面。这些初步结果提示进一步的调查,以验证异常值的持续时间和语义不一致的发生地点之间更准确的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信