Together or Apart: Practical and Theoretical Considerations for Determining When to Keep Foster Siblings Together or to Separate Them

David Lee Caudill
{"title":"Together or Apart: Practical and Theoretical Considerations for Determining When to Keep Foster Siblings Together or to Separate Them","authors":"David Lee Caudill","doi":"10.15520/sslej.v3i5.2155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Siblings share a compelling bond that can be either positive or detrimental to their individual development. This article discusses siblings in the unnatural context of foster care, using attachment theory to explain when siblings should be kept together, and then examines underlying concerns that make separation the healthiest option. While it is a general belief among social workers and other foster care professionals that siblings should always remain together, this is not always possible or proper. It can, and at times should, be determined that the sibling bond is broken and a time of separation – whether temporary or permanent – is in the best interest of the siblings as individuals. While there are many future outcomes that could ensue from such decisions, this article will focus only on the foster placements and the immediate safety and well-being of the children. It will also focus primarily on the development stages of young children during the ages when the ability to bond can be securely solidified or potentially lost forever based on attachment theory. The intention is to encourage foster care professionals to reform current practices and consider each case individually.","PeriodicalId":354321,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Learning Education Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Learning Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15520/sslej.v3i5.2155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Siblings share a compelling bond that can be either positive or detrimental to their individual development. This article discusses siblings in the unnatural context of foster care, using attachment theory to explain when siblings should be kept together, and then examines underlying concerns that make separation the healthiest option. While it is a general belief among social workers and other foster care professionals that siblings should always remain together, this is not always possible or proper. It can, and at times should, be determined that the sibling bond is broken and a time of separation – whether temporary or permanent – is in the best interest of the siblings as individuals. While there are many future outcomes that could ensue from such decisions, this article will focus only on the foster placements and the immediate safety and well-being of the children. It will also focus primarily on the development stages of young children during the ages when the ability to bond can be securely solidified or potentially lost forever based on attachment theory. The intention is to encourage foster care professionals to reform current practices and consider each case individually.
一起或分开:决定何时让寄养兄弟姐妹在一起或分开的实践和理论考虑
兄弟姐妹之间有一种令人信服的联系,这种联系对他们的个人发展可能是积极的,也可能是有害的。这篇文章讨论了寄养环境中不自然的兄弟姐妹,用依恋理论来解释兄弟姐妹什么时候应该在一起,然后检查了使分离成为最健康选择的潜在问题。虽然社会工作者和其他寄养专业人员普遍认为兄弟姐妹应该永远呆在一起,但这并不总是可能的或合适的。可以而且有时应该确定,兄弟姐妹之间的纽带已经破裂,一段时间的分离——无论是暂时的还是永久的——对兄弟姐妹个人来说都是最有利的。虽然这样的决定可能会产生许多未来的结果,但本文将只关注寄养安置以及儿童的即时安全和福祉。它还将主要关注幼儿的发展阶段,在这个阶段,根据依恋理论,联系的能力可以稳固地巩固起来,或者可能永远失去。其目的是鼓励寄养专业人员改革目前的做法,并单独考虑每个案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信