HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING

Piatnytska Galyna
{"title":"HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING","authors":"Piatnytska Galyna","doi":"10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(138)10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The increasing intensity of competition in the international market for higher education services leads to an increase in the importance of brands of higher education institutions (HEIs) and the branding of national higher education in general. The aim of this study is to determine the target setting and the main objectives of the country’s higher education branding in the international market of educational services. Materials and methods. Methods of comparative and critical analysis, analytical processing of the collected data, graphical display of trends and interrelations, synthesis, etc. are used to achieve the purpose and accomplish the assigned tasks. Results. Analysis of the dynamics of appeals to the Google-system with queries to search for such words and phrases as: \"Brand\"; \"Higher education\"; \"Uni­versity\" showed that after a sharp decline in the number of brand and branding queries in March 2020, the trend of increasing attention to this concept among Internet users began to grow again. At the same time, in the last months of 2021, there is a trend towards a decline in requests for higher education and universities. The risk of such a situation for the deve­lopment of existing universities lies in the fact that the latter is happening against the back­ground of the periodic introduction of quarantine restrictions and the loss of the opportunity to establish constant offline communications with students and youth audience. On the basis of a critical analysis, comparison and systematization of the existing definitions of the concepts of \"branding of higher education\" and \"brand of higher edu­cation\", it is proposed to understand the process of \"branding of higher education\" as a process aimed at implementing the strategy for the development of higher education, strengthening the identity of the higher education system of the country in the international market of educational services, support competitiveness of the higher education sector by establishing effective communications with all stakeholder groups both within the country and abroad. It has been substantiated that the \"brand of a higher education institution\" should be understood as a specific model of ideas and value characteristics about the HEI and its educational services in the minds of stakeholders. It is emphasized that the process of the higher education branding should be aimed at forming the value of the brand. This requires the following tasks, the implementation of which: 1) will create a strong competitive brand of higher education in the country, which will help solve educational problems and meet the needs of the labor market, especially within the country; 2) provide preconditions for further geographical diversification in the provision of educational services of the country’s HEIs; 3) will increase the volume of foreign and domestic investment in the educational and scientific space of the country. Along with this, the factors that should be paid attention to in the process of higher education branding and which were formed under the influence of Globalization 4.0 and the manifestation of the consequences of the COVID crisis were identified. Considering the level of development of the higher education system in the country, the choice of one of the following branding strategies for higher education is envisaged: internal orientation; internal-external orientation; external-internal orientation. It is established that Ukraine must now implement a strategy of internal-external orientation of higher education branding. It was noted that it would be better to track the results of higher education branding through special assessment and monitoring of changes in the Global Tertiary Education Brand Index and by region. Conclusion. The problem of the higher education branding, as evidenced by the results of the study, is far from simple and requires the setting of specific tasks, the completion of which should contribute to the achievement of the goal of maximizing the value of the country’s higher education brand. In the process of higher education branding and specific HEIs branding the interests of various groups of stakeholders as well as changes that taking place in the international market of educational services (including due to Globalization 4.0 and the effects of the pandemic) should be taken into account. The results of the study can be further used to develop and substantiate metho­dological approaches to determining the Global Tertiary Education Brand Index and the corresponding country indices, by which it will be possible to track imbalances and competitive advantages in the development of higher education in the regions of the country. Keywords: branding, brand management, higher education, brand of higher education institution, risks, strategies of higher education branding, digitalization, the market of educational services.","PeriodicalId":374872,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(138)10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The increasing intensity of competition in the international market for higher education services leads to an increase in the importance of brands of higher education institutions (HEIs) and the branding of national higher education in general. The aim of this study is to determine the target setting and the main objectives of the country’s higher education branding in the international market of educational services. Materials and methods. Methods of comparative and critical analysis, analytical processing of the collected data, graphical display of trends and interrelations, synthesis, etc. are used to achieve the purpose and accomplish the assigned tasks. Results. Analysis of the dynamics of appeals to the Google-system with queries to search for such words and phrases as: "Brand"; "Higher education"; "Uni­versity" showed that after a sharp decline in the number of brand and branding queries in March 2020, the trend of increasing attention to this concept among Internet users began to grow again. At the same time, in the last months of 2021, there is a trend towards a decline in requests for higher education and universities. The risk of such a situation for the deve­lopment of existing universities lies in the fact that the latter is happening against the back­ground of the periodic introduction of quarantine restrictions and the loss of the opportunity to establish constant offline communications with students and youth audience. On the basis of a critical analysis, comparison and systematization of the existing definitions of the concepts of "branding of higher education" and "brand of higher edu­cation", it is proposed to understand the process of "branding of higher education" as a process aimed at implementing the strategy for the development of higher education, strengthening the identity of the higher education system of the country in the international market of educational services, support competitiveness of the higher education sector by establishing effective communications with all stakeholder groups both within the country and abroad. It has been substantiated that the "brand of a higher education institution" should be understood as a specific model of ideas and value characteristics about the HEI and its educational services in the minds of stakeholders. It is emphasized that the process of the higher education branding should be aimed at forming the value of the brand. This requires the following tasks, the implementation of which: 1) will create a strong competitive brand of higher education in the country, which will help solve educational problems and meet the needs of the labor market, especially within the country; 2) provide preconditions for further geographical diversification in the provision of educational services of the country’s HEIs; 3) will increase the volume of foreign and domestic investment in the educational and scientific space of the country. Along with this, the factors that should be paid attention to in the process of higher education branding and which were formed under the influence of Globalization 4.0 and the manifestation of the consequences of the COVID crisis were identified. Considering the level of development of the higher education system in the country, the choice of one of the following branding strategies for higher education is envisaged: internal orientation; internal-external orientation; external-internal orientation. It is established that Ukraine must now implement a strategy of internal-external orientation of higher education branding. It was noted that it would be better to track the results of higher education branding through special assessment and monitoring of changes in the Global Tertiary Education Brand Index and by region. Conclusion. The problem of the higher education branding, as evidenced by the results of the study, is far from simple and requires the setting of specific tasks, the completion of which should contribute to the achievement of the goal of maximizing the value of the country’s higher education brand. In the process of higher education branding and specific HEIs branding the interests of various groups of stakeholders as well as changes that taking place in the international market of educational services (including due to Globalization 4.0 and the effects of the pandemic) should be taken into account. The results of the study can be further used to develop and substantiate metho­dological approaches to determining the Global Tertiary Education Brand Index and the corresponding country indices, by which it will be possible to track imbalances and competitive advantages in the development of higher education in the regions of the country. Keywords: branding, brand management, higher education, brand of higher education institution, risks, strategies of higher education branding, digitalization, the market of educational services.
高等教育品牌
背景。随着国际高等教育服务市场竞争的日益激烈,高等教育机构品牌和国家高等教育品牌的重要性日益增加。本研究的目的是确定我国高等教育品牌在国际教育服务市场上的目标设定和主要目标。材料和方法。采用比较分析和批判分析、收集数据的分析处理、趋势和相互关系的图形显示、综合等方法来达到目的并完成指定的任务。结果。分析对谷歌系统的诉求动态,搜索诸如“品牌”这样的单词和短语;“高等教育”;《大学》显示,在2020年3月品牌和品牌查询数量急剧下降之后,互联网用户对这一概念的关注度开始再次上升。与此同时,在2021年的最后几个月,对高等教育和大学的申请呈下降趋势。这种情况对现有大学发展的风险在于,后者是在定期引入隔离限制的背景下发生的,并且失去了与学生和青年受众建立持续离线沟通的机会。在对“高等教育品牌化”和“高等教育品牌化”概念的现有定义进行批判性分析、比较和系统化的基础上,提出将“高等教育品牌化”过程理解为旨在实施高等教育发展战略,增强国家高等教育体系在国际教育服务市场上的认同的过程。通过与国内外所有利益相关团体建立有效的沟通,支持高等教育部门的竞争力。实践证明,“高等教育品牌”应被理解为利益相关者心目中高等教育及其教育服务的理念和价值特征的具体模式。强调高等教育品牌化的过程应以品牌价值的形成为目标。这需要以下任务,其中的实施:1)将创建一个强大的竞争力品牌的高等教育在国内,这将有助于解决教育问题,满足劳动力市场的需求,特别是在国内;2)为本港高等教育院校在提供教育服务方面进一步实现地域多元化提供先决条件;3)将增加对我国教育和科学领域的国内外投资。同时,找出了在全球化4.0影响下形成的高等教育品牌化过程中应注意的因素,以及新冠危机后果的表现。考虑到我国高等教育体系的发展水平,设想高等教育品牌战略的选择:内部定位;内外倾向;external-internal取向。乌克兰目前必须实施高等教育品牌化内外结合的战略。有人指出,最好是通过特别评估和监测全球高等教育品牌指数的变化,并按区域跟踪高等教育品牌的结果。结论。研究结果表明,高等教育品牌问题远非简单的问题,需要设定具体的任务,这些任务的完成应该有助于实现国家高等教育品牌价值最大化的目标。在高等教育品牌化和具体高等教育机构品牌化的过程中,应考虑各利益相关者群体的利益,以及国际教育服务市场上发生的变化(包括全球化4.0和大流行的影响)。这项研究的结果可以进一步用于发展和证实确定全球高等教育品牌指数和相应的国家指数的方法学方法,通过这些方法,可以跟踪该国各地区高等教育发展中的不平衡和竞争优势。关键词:品牌,品牌管理,高等教育,高等院校品牌,风险,高等教育品牌策略,数字化,教育服务市场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信