Novel Inflow Control Device Bridges the Gap Between Passive and Autonomous Technologies

Floyd Simonds, Liang Zhao, José A. Montoya
{"title":"Novel Inflow Control Device Bridges the Gap Between Passive and Autonomous Technologies","authors":"Floyd Simonds, Liang Zhao, José A. Montoya","doi":"10.2118/212775-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Operators in need of improved reservoir drainage, increases in ultimate recovery, and delay of unwanted fluid production are faced with a choice between passive and autonomous inflow control devices (ICD / AICD) to manage these issues most effectively. Production challenges leading to this choice are increasing as water production in particular across the globe continues to rise.\n Passive Inflow Control Devices (ICD) have been used with great effect throughout the world. Multiple variants exist using nozzle, tube, or helical designs to balance inflow in long horizontal wells and those with permeability variations. Each type of ICD has various degrees of viscosity insensitivity, with the nozzle-type being seen as relatively viscosity insensitive, which is true when the viscosities of the oil and water are nearly similar. As the viscosities between the two diverge, however, all passive ICD's produce more water than oil at breakthrough for a given pressure.\n As ICD's only delay the onset of water and gas breakthrough, however, the industry moved to develop Autonomous ICD's (AICD), which sense the presence of unwanted fluid without any connection to or intervention from the surface. The majority of AICD devices available currently contain moving parts and require close tolerances to deliver their unique benefits. They were initially specifically designed for light oil applications in long horizontal wells to shut off the majority of produced water overall. While this is desirable in low oil viscosity wells it may not be as effective with increases in viscosity due to the need to produce water in order to produce the oil.\n The design proposed in this paper uses no moving parts, significantly restricts water production in a wide range of crude viscosities, is easily configured for a variety of downhole conditions, and delivers passive ICD performance with AICD benefits using a simple, reliable, and unique design.\n The tool functions to restrict water production progressively as either oil viscosity or water cut increase without ever completely or nearly completely closing to production, which makes it an excellent solution for marginal production wells, younger reservoirs, and wells with lower overall production rates compared to other technologies.\n The paper will discuss the theory of the device's functionality to differentiate between fluids present. Laboratory test results will be shown to demonstrate flow performance as well as API 19ICD[1] testing for erosion, plugging resistance, and mud flow initiation testing. In addition, an example comparing an open hole base case to the new device's performance in a sample reservoir will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":437231,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212775-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operators in need of improved reservoir drainage, increases in ultimate recovery, and delay of unwanted fluid production are faced with a choice between passive and autonomous inflow control devices (ICD / AICD) to manage these issues most effectively. Production challenges leading to this choice are increasing as water production in particular across the globe continues to rise. Passive Inflow Control Devices (ICD) have been used with great effect throughout the world. Multiple variants exist using nozzle, tube, or helical designs to balance inflow in long horizontal wells and those with permeability variations. Each type of ICD has various degrees of viscosity insensitivity, with the nozzle-type being seen as relatively viscosity insensitive, which is true when the viscosities of the oil and water are nearly similar. As the viscosities between the two diverge, however, all passive ICD's produce more water than oil at breakthrough for a given pressure. As ICD's only delay the onset of water and gas breakthrough, however, the industry moved to develop Autonomous ICD's (AICD), which sense the presence of unwanted fluid without any connection to or intervention from the surface. The majority of AICD devices available currently contain moving parts and require close tolerances to deliver their unique benefits. They were initially specifically designed for light oil applications in long horizontal wells to shut off the majority of produced water overall. While this is desirable in low oil viscosity wells it may not be as effective with increases in viscosity due to the need to produce water in order to produce the oil. The design proposed in this paper uses no moving parts, significantly restricts water production in a wide range of crude viscosities, is easily configured for a variety of downhole conditions, and delivers passive ICD performance with AICD benefits using a simple, reliable, and unique design. The tool functions to restrict water production progressively as either oil viscosity or water cut increase without ever completely or nearly completely closing to production, which makes it an excellent solution for marginal production wells, younger reservoirs, and wells with lower overall production rates compared to other technologies. The paper will discuss the theory of the device's functionality to differentiate between fluids present. Laboratory test results will be shown to demonstrate flow performance as well as API 19ICD[1] testing for erosion, plugging resistance, and mud flow initiation testing. In addition, an example comparing an open hole base case to the new device's performance in a sample reservoir will be discussed.
新型流入控制装置弥合了被动和自主技术之间的差距
为了最有效地解决这些问题,作业者必须在被动流入控制装置(ICD / AICD)和自主流入控制装置(ICD / AICD)之间做出选择。随着全球用水量的持续增加,导致这一选择的生产挑战也在增加。无源流入控制装置(ICD)在世界范围内得到了广泛应用,并取得了良好的效果。在长水平井和具有渗透率变化的井中,存在多种喷嘴、管柱或螺旋设计来平衡流入。每种类型的ICD都有不同程度的粘度不敏感,喷嘴型被认为是相对粘度不敏感的,当油和水的粘度几乎相似时,情况就是如此。然而,由于两者之间的粘度不同,在给定压力下,所有被动ICD在突破时产生的水都比油多。然而,由于ICD只是延迟了水与气的突破,行业开始开发自主ICD (AICD),它可以在不与地面连接或干预的情况下感知不需要的流体的存在。目前可用的大多数AICD设备都包含活动部件,并且需要严格的公差才能发挥其独特的优势。它们最初是专门为长水平井中的轻质油应用而设计的,以切断大部分产出水。虽然这在低油粘度井中是理想的,但由于需要采出水才能采出油,因此在粘度增加时可能不那么有效。本文提出的设计不使用活动部件,在很大的原油粘度范围内显著限制出水量,易于针对各种井下条件进行配置,通过简单、可靠和独特的设计,提供具有AICD优势的被动ICD性能。该工具的功能是随着油粘度或含水率的增加而逐渐限制产水,而不会完全或几乎完全接近生产,这使得它与其他技术相比,对于边际生产井、年轻油藏和整体产量较低的井来说是一种出色的解决方案。本文将讨论该装置的功能,以区分流体存在的理论。实验室测试结果将展示流动性能,以及API 19ICD[1]侵蚀测试、抗堵测试和泥浆起流测试。此外,还将讨论裸眼基础情况与新装置在样品储层中的性能比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信