Insurance Structure and Class-Action Settlements

B. Sarath, James M. McCarrick
{"title":"Insurance Structure and Class-Action Settlements","authors":"B. Sarath, James M. McCarrick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3355118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines an aspect of Security Class Action dynamics that has not been previously analyzed using game theory: the effects of fragmentation of interests across the insured defendant and potentially multiple-insurers who are all subject to losses under the class action. Incentive conflicts within the defense coalition not only affects the settlements reached but can result in different level of settlements in cases which are of similar merit (operationalized as facing the same loss function should the case go to trial). Our paper provides an explanation for such outcomes even if the legal system is not subject to any obvious form of inefficiency.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines an aspect of Security Class Action dynamics that has not been previously analyzed using game theory: the effects of fragmentation of interests across the insured defendant and potentially multiple-insurers who are all subject to losses under the class action. Incentive conflicts within the defense coalition not only affects the settlements reached but can result in different level of settlements in cases which are of similar merit (operationalized as facing the same loss function should the case go to trial). Our paper provides an explanation for such outcomes even if the legal system is not subject to any obvious form of inefficiency.
保险结构和集体诉讼和解
本文研究了安全集体诉讼动力学的一个方面,以前没有使用博弈论进行分析:在集体诉讼下,保险被告和潜在的多家保险公司都受到损失的利益碎片化的影响。防御联盟内部的激励冲突不仅影响达成的和解,而且可能导致在具有类似价值的案件中达成不同程度的和解(如果案件进入审判,将面临相同的损失函数)。我们的论文为这种结果提供了一种解释,即使法律体系没有出现任何明显的低效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信