Review of Concurrent Engineering Design practice in the space sector: state of the art and future perspectives

D. Knoll, C. Fortin, A. Golkar
{"title":"Review of Concurrent Engineering Design practice in the space sector: state of the art and future perspectives","authors":"D. Knoll, C. Fortin, A. Golkar","doi":"10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a survey conducted across industry, government agencies and academic organizations running concurrent design facilities for space applications, to analyze the differences in people management, tools, processes and facilities across many organizations using concurrent design. Our analysis is based on a literature review and structured interviews. Most organizations applying concurrent design also participate in related conferences and publish on their experiences with the approach. We collected data through a survey among subject matter experts involved in various roles in this type of concurrent design. The answers are evaluated quantitatively to allow a clear characterization of the state-of the-art. The data underpins common ideas about benefits and challenges of the concurrent design approach with data. We compiled statistics about minimal, typical and maximal team sizes, study duration, as well as size and critical features of facilities, and many more aspects. This review summarizes the learnings from concurrent design practice and describes open challenges to be addressed in future research.","PeriodicalId":192753,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","volume":"387 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We present a survey conducted across industry, government agencies and academic organizations running concurrent design facilities for space applications, to analyze the differences in people management, tools, processes and facilities across many organizations using concurrent design. Our analysis is based on a literature review and structured interviews. Most organizations applying concurrent design also participate in related conferences and publish on their experiences with the approach. We collected data through a survey among subject matter experts involved in various roles in this type of concurrent design. The answers are evaluated quantitatively to allow a clear characterization of the state-of the-art. The data underpins common ideas about benefits and challenges of the concurrent design approach with data. We compiled statistics about minimal, typical and maximal team sizes, study duration, as well as size and critical features of facilities, and many more aspects. This review summarizes the learnings from concurrent design practice and describes open challenges to be addressed in future research.
空间领域并行工程设计实践综述:现状与未来展望
我们提出了一项针对运行空间应用并行设计设施的行业、政府机构和学术组织进行的调查,以分析使用并行设计的许多组织在人员管理、工具、流程和设施方面的差异。我们的分析是基于文献综述和结构化访谈。大多数应用并行设计的组织也会参加相关的会议,并发表他们使用该方法的经验。我们通过对在这种类型的并发设计中扮演不同角色的主题专家进行调查来收集数据。对答案进行定量评估,以便清楚地描述最新的状态。这些数据支持了关于数据并发设计方法的好处和挑战的常见想法。我们编制了关于最小、典型和最大团队规模、研究持续时间、设施规模和关键特征以及许多其他方面的统计数据。这篇综述总结了从并行设计实践中学到的东西,并描述了在未来研究中需要解决的开放挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信