비이원성의 미학: 진정한 초월, 감지할 수 없는 타자, 그리고 영화

Jae-seong Lee
{"title":"비이원성의 미학: 진정한 초월, 감지할 수 없는 타자, 그리고 영화","authors":"Jae-seong Lee","doi":"10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops the aesthetics of nonduality mainly with Deleuze’s “transcendental ontology” and Levinas’s poststructural “ethics.” Although Deleuze (and Felix Guattari) and Levinas’s thoughts were nourished in different philosophical lines, their ideas seem to be actually the closest ones in contemporary Western world. Deleuze’s notions of pure “desire,” “becoming,” and “affect” are very similar to Levinas’s ethical explication of “metaphysical desire” and “enjoyment.” Then Mahayana Buddhism is also brought not only to support but to complete the traits of “nonduality.” This paper begins with their views that are in contrast to binary opposition and the stable “transcendence” that had been the central idea in the tradition of Western metaphysics. Then it is argued in various ways that Deleuze actually explicates the same realm as Levinas elaborates in terms of genuine transcendence. Then I discuss Joker, the 2020 Oscar and the Golden Lion (the grand prize at the Venice Film Festival given to the film with the highest artistic value) winning film. Joker is one of the most shocking and self-deconstructive films from the perspective of truly poststructural meanings of nonduality. The aesthetic role of the violence in the film is discussed in great detail. I hope this interdisciplinary study would contribute to the development of critical theory of the present age.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops the aesthetics of nonduality mainly with Deleuze’s “transcendental ontology” and Levinas’s poststructural “ethics.” Although Deleuze (and Felix Guattari) and Levinas’s thoughts were nourished in different philosophical lines, their ideas seem to be actually the closest ones in contemporary Western world. Deleuze’s notions of pure “desire,” “becoming,” and “affect” are very similar to Levinas’s ethical explication of “metaphysical desire” and “enjoyment.” Then Mahayana Buddhism is also brought not only to support but to complete the traits of “nonduality.” This paper begins with their views that are in contrast to binary opposition and the stable “transcendence” that had been the central idea in the tradition of Western metaphysics. Then it is argued in various ways that Deleuze actually explicates the same realm as Levinas elaborates in terms of genuine transcendence. Then I discuss Joker, the 2020 Oscar and the Golden Lion (the grand prize at the Venice Film Festival given to the film with the highest artistic value) winning film. Joker is one of the most shocking and self-deconstructive films from the perspective of truly poststructural meanings of nonduality. The aesthetic role of the violence in the film is discussed in great detail. I hope this interdisciplinary study would contribute to the development of critical theory of the present age.
非二元性的美学:真正的超越,无法感知的他人,还有电影
本文主要以德勒兹的“先验本体论”和列维纳斯的后结构“伦理学”来发展非二元性美学。虽然德勒兹(和费利克斯·瓜塔里)和列维纳斯的思想在不同的哲学路线中得到滋养,但他们的思想在当代西方世界似乎是最接近的。德勒兹关于纯粹的“欲望”、“成为”和“情感”的概念与列维纳斯对“形而上学的欲望”和“享受”的伦理解释非常相似。然后大乘佛教也被引入,不仅支持而且完成了“非二元性”的特征。本文首先从他们的观点出发,与二元对立和西方形而上学传统中稳定的“超越性”形成鲜明对比。然后,人们以不同的方式争论德勒兹实际上阐释了和列维纳斯在真正的超越方面所阐述的相同的领域。然后我讨论了《小丑》,2020年奥斯卡奖和金狮奖(威尼斯电影节授予艺术价值最高的电影的大奖)获奖影片。从非二元性的真正后结构意义的角度来看,《小丑》是最令人震惊和自我解构的电影之一。对影片中暴力的美学作用进行了详细的探讨。我希望这一跨学科的研究能为当代批判理论的发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信