Inspecting a Machine Learning Based Clinical Risk Calculator: A Practical Perspective

Q. Thurier, Ning Hua, L. Boyle, A. Spyker
{"title":"Inspecting a Machine Learning Based Clinical Risk Calculator: A Practical Perspective","authors":"Q. Thurier, Ning Hua, L. Boyle, A. Spyker","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2019.00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health is reaching a point where machines are more accurate than humans, or at least as accurate but with less effort, in more and more applications. However, accuracy alone is not enough, explanation and understanding is equally important to clinicians, governments, and patients. Possibly leading to loss of health benefits potentially realized through increasingly accurate algorithms. However, various techniques exist for auditing machine learning systems via insightful visualisations. Modelling best practices, parallel computations and open source technologies facilitate implementation of these techniques. This paper leverages several of these methods to increase interpretability for a black-box clinical risk calculator, hopefully opening the door to a better adoption of modern machine learning pipelines in the healthcare sector.","PeriodicalId":311634,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2019.00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Health is reaching a point where machines are more accurate than humans, or at least as accurate but with less effort, in more and more applications. However, accuracy alone is not enough, explanation and understanding is equally important to clinicians, governments, and patients. Possibly leading to loss of health benefits potentially realized through increasingly accurate algorithms. However, various techniques exist for auditing machine learning systems via insightful visualisations. Modelling best practices, parallel computations and open source technologies facilitate implementation of these techniques. This paper leverages several of these methods to increase interpretability for a black-box clinical risk calculator, hopefully opening the door to a better adoption of modern machine learning pipelines in the healthcare sector.
检查基于机器学习的临床风险计算器:一个实用的视角
在越来越多的应用中,机器正在达到比人类更准确的地步,或者至少和人类一样准确,但更省力。然而,仅仅准确是不够的,解释和理解对临床医生、政府和患者同样重要。可能会导致失去可能通过越来越精确的算法实现的健康益处。然而,有各种各样的技术可以通过深刻的可视化来审计机器学习系统。建模最佳实践、并行计算和开源技术促进了这些技术的实现。本文利用其中几种方法来提高黑箱临床风险计算器的可解释性,希望为医疗保健领域更好地采用现代机器学习管道打开大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信