Logical Design Matrix (LDM): How to operationalize systemic projectual design thinking in complex contexts.

Katherine Mollenhauer, Cala Del Rio, J. Rodríguez, Daniela Bianchi, Sara Riveros
{"title":"Logical Design Matrix (LDM): How to operationalize systemic projectual\n design thinking in complex contexts.","authors":"Katherine Mollenhauer, Cala Del Rio, J. Rodríguez, Daniela Bianchi, Sara Riveros","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the design discipline has achieved a leading role in\n fields of knowledge where complex projects requiring a systemic scope are\n addressed and implemented. This has created the challenge for designers to\n communicate to others the way in which this discipline generates knowledge\n in applied research projects. For most design practitioners, this is\n implicit in the way projects are carried out, however, professionals from\n other disciplines that make up teams do not always have the same\n understanding of the process, making it difficult to move forward together\n within a project framework. Simultaneously, nowadays the complexity of\n situations being addressed has escalated exponentially. Problems are no\n longer bounded, where there is a one-way solution, instead they exist within\n complex ecosystems and are in constant movement, where responses must be\n systemic and have the same mutation potential to evolve as the context and\n its issues do. In this context, designers as part of interdisciplinary teams\n have a double challenge. On the one hand, to contribute from and for the\n design discipline itself, by displaying and communicating the design process\n methods within the design spectrum. And, on the other hand, to implement and\n demonstrate to others the methodological contribution of the design\n projective thinking in the general process of the multidisciplinary team.\n This article proposes and discusses a model and a systemic instrument that\n addresses the complexity present in the materialization and\n operationalization of the contribution of the projectual design thinking\n process. The synthesis of the model and subsequent instrument is presented\n through the review, systematization and discussion of cases where this tool\n has been applied. Both methodological and systemic elements are relevant for\n the internal organization of the applied research project as well as for the\n interdisciplinary team that develops it and the stakeholders involved.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the design discipline has achieved a leading role in fields of knowledge where complex projects requiring a systemic scope are addressed and implemented. This has created the challenge for designers to communicate to others the way in which this discipline generates knowledge in applied research projects. For most design practitioners, this is implicit in the way projects are carried out, however, professionals from other disciplines that make up teams do not always have the same understanding of the process, making it difficult to move forward together within a project framework. Simultaneously, nowadays the complexity of situations being addressed has escalated exponentially. Problems are no longer bounded, where there is a one-way solution, instead they exist within complex ecosystems and are in constant movement, where responses must be systemic and have the same mutation potential to evolve as the context and its issues do. In this context, designers as part of interdisciplinary teams have a double challenge. On the one hand, to contribute from and for the design discipline itself, by displaying and communicating the design process methods within the design spectrum. And, on the other hand, to implement and demonstrate to others the methodological contribution of the design projective thinking in the general process of the multidisciplinary team. This article proposes and discusses a model and a systemic instrument that addresses the complexity present in the materialization and operationalization of the contribution of the projectual design thinking process. The synthesis of the model and subsequent instrument is presented through the review, systematization and discussion of cases where this tool has been applied. Both methodological and systemic elements are relevant for the internal organization of the applied research project as well as for the interdisciplinary team that develops it and the stakeholders involved.
逻辑设计矩阵(LDM):如何在复杂环境中实施系统的项目设计思维。
近年来,设计学科在需要系统范围的复杂项目被解决和实施的知识领域中发挥了主导作用。这就给设计师们带来了挑战,他们要与他人交流这门学科在应用研究项目中产生知识的方式。对于大多数设计从业者来说,这在项目执行的方式中是隐含的,然而,组成团队的其他学科的专业人员并不总是对过程有相同的理解,这使得在项目框架内一起前进变得困难。同时,目前正在处理的局势的复杂性呈指数级上升。问题不再局限于单向解决方案,而是存在于复杂的生态系统中,并不断变化,其中的反应必须是系统性的,并且具有与环境及其问题相同的突变潜力。在这种情况下,设计师作为跨学科团队的一员面临着双重挑战。一方面,通过展示和交流设计范围内的设计过程方法,为设计学科本身做出贡献。另一方面,在多学科团队的一般过程中,实现并向他人展示设计投射思维的方法论贡献。本文提出并讨论了一个模型和一个系统的工具,以解决项目设计思维过程中贡献的物化和操作化中的复杂性。通过对该工具已应用的案例的回顾、系统化和讨论,提出了模型和后续工具的综合。方法和系统元素都与应用研究项目的内部组织以及开发该项目的跨学科团队和所涉及的利益相关者相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信