Comparison Between ANSYS Fluent and Solidworks Internal Flow Simulation for Analysis of A Fuzzy Logic Controller-Based Heating/Cooling System in A Mobile Robot Design

M. Afaq, R. Ahmad
{"title":"Comparison Between ANSYS Fluent and Solidworks Internal Flow Simulation for Analysis of A Fuzzy Logic Controller-Based Heating/Cooling System in A Mobile Robot Design","authors":"M. Afaq, R. Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/ICRAI57502.2023.10089571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software's have become important tools to study the behavior of fluids in the design phase of robots in various applications. This includes fluid behavior around underwater remotely operated vehicles, aerodynamic characteristics of mobile robots/drones in extreme outdoor environments, and internal flow simulation to determine the heating/cooling time of an enclosed space and estimate the system's energy requirements. For this paper, two CFD software's; ANSYS Fluent and Solidworks 2022 are used to conduct a CFD analysis on the heating/cooling of the internal space of a mobile robot design aimed to operate in extreme temperatures ranging from −40 °C to 50 °C. Heating time is determined by using a constant power magnitude of 8138683 W/m3 emitted from four different heating elements located at different parts of the robot body and two fans rotating at 1800 rpm. Moreover, the cooling time of the internal space is evaluated based on fans operating at 6000 rpm over the electronics and three outlets that direct the warm air to the outside environment. For both software's, the same boundary conditions were applied to the robot body to obtain fair results for comparison. Based on the simulation results, the desired temperature of 8 °C from an initial temperature of −40 °C was reached within 44 s for ANSYS Fluent and 650 s for Solidworks. For cooling, 8 °C was obtained within 6 s for ANSYS Fluent and 24 s for Solidworks. The difference in the results between the two software's is mainly due to the method in which the fluid domain is defined. In the case of Solidworks, it considers the material thickness on the boundary between solid/fluid regions.","PeriodicalId":447565,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Industry (ICRAI)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Industry (ICRAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAI57502.2023.10089571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software's have become important tools to study the behavior of fluids in the design phase of robots in various applications. This includes fluid behavior around underwater remotely operated vehicles, aerodynamic characteristics of mobile robots/drones in extreme outdoor environments, and internal flow simulation to determine the heating/cooling time of an enclosed space and estimate the system's energy requirements. For this paper, two CFD software's; ANSYS Fluent and Solidworks 2022 are used to conduct a CFD analysis on the heating/cooling of the internal space of a mobile robot design aimed to operate in extreme temperatures ranging from −40 °C to 50 °C. Heating time is determined by using a constant power magnitude of 8138683 W/m3 emitted from four different heating elements located at different parts of the robot body and two fans rotating at 1800 rpm. Moreover, the cooling time of the internal space is evaluated based on fans operating at 6000 rpm over the electronics and three outlets that direct the warm air to the outside environment. For both software's, the same boundary conditions were applied to the robot body to obtain fair results for comparison. Based on the simulation results, the desired temperature of 8 °C from an initial temperature of −40 °C was reached within 44 s for ANSYS Fluent and 650 s for Solidworks. For cooling, 8 °C was obtained within 6 s for ANSYS Fluent and 24 s for Solidworks. The difference in the results between the two software's is mainly due to the method in which the fluid domain is defined. In the case of Solidworks, it considers the material thickness on the boundary between solid/fluid regions.
基于模糊逻辑控制器的移动机器人冷热系统设计中ANSYS Fluent与Solidworks内部流场仿真的比较
目前,计算流体动力学(CFD)软件已成为研究机器人设计阶段流体行为的重要工具。这包括水下远程操作车辆周围的流体行为,移动机器人/无人机在极端室外环境中的空气动力学特性,以及内部流动模拟,以确定封闭空间的加热/冷却时间,并估计系统的能量需求。本文采用了两种CFD软件;利用ANSYS Fluent和Solidworks 2022对移动机器人内部空间的加热/冷却设计进行CFD分析,目标是在- 40°C至50°C的极端温度范围内工作。加热时间由位于机器人身体不同部位的四个不同加热元件和两个以1800 rpm旋转的风扇发出的恒定功率大小8138683 W/m3来确定。此外,内部空间的冷却时间是基于在电子设备上以6000转/分钟的速度运行的风扇和三个将热空气引导到外部环境的出口来评估的。两种软件对机器人本体采用了相同的边界条件,得到了比较公平的结果。根据仿真结果,ANSYS Fluent和Solidworks分别在44 s和650 s内将初始温度从- 40°C提高到8°C。对于冷却,ANSYS Fluent在6秒内达到8℃,Solidworks在24秒内达到8℃。两种软件计算结果的差异主要是由于定义流体域的方法不同。在Solidworks中,它考虑固体/流体区域边界上的材料厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信