Doing ‘Development’ Direct to Sector: The International Finance Corporation and the Financialisation of ‘Development’ in Asia

T. Carroll
{"title":"Doing ‘Development’ Direct to Sector: The International Finance Corporation and the Financialisation of ‘Development’ in Asia","authors":"T. Carroll","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1959702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an important new push taking place in development practice, whereby international public organisations are broadening and deepening private sector activity in the underdeveloped world in ways well beyond Washington consensus structural adjustment or even post-Washington consensus (PWC) forms of institutionally-oriented ‘participatory neoliberalism’. Described here as the ‘financialisation of development’ (FoD), this process – which dovetails with the late PWC agenda – is attracting increasing resources that are formally allocated directly to private actors around states, yet which also demand and promote shifts in state form and function that relate to cultivating an ‘enabling environment’ for capital. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) – the World Bank’s private sector arm – is at the vanguard of this process, bridging the ‘public-private divide’ in myriad ways. This paper first conceptualises the project that the likes of the IFC are involved in, drawing upon a framework based upon various lineages of critical political economy. From this perspective, FoD is seen as a rapidly expanding new push within neoliberalism, emerging out of the frustrations of earlier phases of orthodox ‘development’ practice. This approach entails rolling out the market state and establishing market society, two tasks that FoD’s instruments are highly tuned towards achieving. Focusing on the work of the IFC in the Asia-Pacific, the second section of the paper then presents three snapshots of FoD in action. These serve to illustrate the strategies and ‘logic’ underpinning the push, while also pointing to the risks accompanying it.","PeriodicalId":236062,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: International Institutions eJournal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: International Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1959702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes an important new push taking place in development practice, whereby international public organisations are broadening and deepening private sector activity in the underdeveloped world in ways well beyond Washington consensus structural adjustment or even post-Washington consensus (PWC) forms of institutionally-oriented ‘participatory neoliberalism’. Described here as the ‘financialisation of development’ (FoD), this process – which dovetails with the late PWC agenda – is attracting increasing resources that are formally allocated directly to private actors around states, yet which also demand and promote shifts in state form and function that relate to cultivating an ‘enabling environment’ for capital. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) – the World Bank’s private sector arm – is at the vanguard of this process, bridging the ‘public-private divide’ in myriad ways. This paper first conceptualises the project that the likes of the IFC are involved in, drawing upon a framework based upon various lineages of critical political economy. From this perspective, FoD is seen as a rapidly expanding new push within neoliberalism, emerging out of the frustrations of earlier phases of orthodox ‘development’ practice. This approach entails rolling out the market state and establishing market society, two tasks that FoD’s instruments are highly tuned towards achieving. Focusing on the work of the IFC in the Asia-Pacific, the second section of the paper then presents three snapshots of FoD in action. These serve to illustrate the strategies and ‘logic’ underpinning the push, while also pointing to the risks accompanying it.
让“发展”直接导向部门:国际金融公司与亚洲“发展”的金融化
本文描述了发展实践中正在发生的一种重要的新推动,即国际公共组织正在以远远超出华盛顿共识结构调整甚至是后华盛顿共识(PWC)形式的制度导向的“参与式新自由主义”的方式,扩大和深化不发达国家的私营部门活动。这里将其描述为“发展的金融化”(FoD),这一过程与普华永道最近的议程相吻合,正在吸引越来越多的资源,这些资源被正式直接分配给各州的私人行为者,但这也要求和促进国家形式和功能的转变,这些转变与培养资本的“有利环境”有关。国际金融公司(IFC)——世界银行的私营部门机构——是这一进程的先锋,以各种方式弥合“公私鸿沟”。本文首先对国际金融公司等机构参与的项目进行了概念化,借鉴了基于批判政治经济学各种谱系的框架。从这个角度来看,FoD被视为新自由主义内部迅速扩张的新推动力,它出现在正统“发展”实践早期阶段的挫折中。这种方法需要推出市场国家和建立市场社会,这两项任务是FoD的工具高度调整以实现的。本文第二部分重点介绍了国际金融公司在亚太地区的工作,并介绍了粮农组织在行动中的三个概况。这些都说明了支持这一举措的战略和“逻辑”,同时也指出了随之而来的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信