Iraqi EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Perceptions and Practices

Fryad Hama Najib Muhammad, M. Bardakçı
{"title":"Iraqi EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Perceptions and Practices","authors":"Fryad Hama Najib Muhammad, M. Bardakçı","doi":"10.24093/AWEJ/VOL10NO2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In current educational approaches, the purpose and functions of assessment have extended, and teachers are expected to have good knowledge of the principles of modern assessment. In line with this fact, the present study investigated the assessment literacy levels of Iraqi English language teachers through Classroom Assessment Literacy Inventory (CALI) based on the seven standards of teachers’ assessment competence for educational assessment of students developed by the American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education and National Education Association (1990). The data were collected from 101 teachers working at secondary and preparatory schools of Suleymaniyah and Arbil governorates in the North of Iraq. The findings revealed that Iraqi English language teachers responded less than 15 correct responses out of 35 questions. According to the findings, teachers got the lowest score from standard seven (recognizing unethical, illegal, and otherwise inappropriate assessment methods and uses of assessment information). The highest score was from standard four (using assessment results when making educational decisions). Although 77% of teachers reported to have been adequately trained for assessment, the results revealed that they had low level of assessment literacy. Revisions in teacher preparation programs and preparation of professional training courses for in-service teachers are recommended.","PeriodicalId":173713,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24093/AWEJ/VOL10NO2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In current educational approaches, the purpose and functions of assessment have extended, and teachers are expected to have good knowledge of the principles of modern assessment. In line with this fact, the present study investigated the assessment literacy levels of Iraqi English language teachers through Classroom Assessment Literacy Inventory (CALI) based on the seven standards of teachers’ assessment competence for educational assessment of students developed by the American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education and National Education Association (1990). The data were collected from 101 teachers working at secondary and preparatory schools of Suleymaniyah and Arbil governorates in the North of Iraq. The findings revealed that Iraqi English language teachers responded less than 15 correct responses out of 35 questions. According to the findings, teachers got the lowest score from standard seven (recognizing unethical, illegal, and otherwise inappropriate assessment methods and uses of assessment information). The highest score was from standard four (using assessment results when making educational decisions). Although 77% of teachers reported to have been adequately trained for assessment, the results revealed that they had low level of assessment literacy. Revisions in teacher preparation programs and preparation of professional training courses for in-service teachers are recommended.
伊拉克英语教师评价素养:认知与实践
在目前的教育方法中,评估的目的和功能已经扩展,教师被期望对现代评估的原则有很好的了解。有鉴于此,本研究以美国教师联合会、全国教育测量委员会和全国教育协会(1990年)制定的七种教师评估学生教育评估能力标准为基础,通过课堂评估识字量表(CALI)调查了伊拉克英语教师的评估识字水平。这些数据是从伊拉克北部苏莱曼尼亚省和埃尔比勒省的中学和预科学校的101名教师中收集的。调查结果显示,在35个问题中,伊拉克英语教师回答正确的不到15个。根据调查结果,教师在标准七(识别不道德,非法和其他不适当的评估方法和评估信息的使用)中得分最低。最高分来自标准四(在做出教育决策时使用评估结果)。尽管77%的教师报告接受过充分的评估培训,但结果显示他们的评估素养水平较低。建议修订教师培训计划,并为在职教师准备专业培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信