Evaluation of Biostimulants for Low-Cost Input Solution for Onion Crop (Allium cepa L.) Cultivation in Four Districts of Maharashtra, by Providing Resistance or Tolerance against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses Related to Global Climate Change

Reji Kurien Thomas, Satyam Khagen Bose
{"title":"Evaluation of Biostimulants for Low-Cost Input Solution for Onion Crop (Allium cepa L.) Cultivation in Four Districts of Maharashtra, by Providing Resistance or Tolerance against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses Related to Global Climate Change","authors":"Reji Kurien Thomas, Satyam Khagen Bose","doi":"10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i4198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of agronomic activities, based on the use of biostimulants, is an important element of agroecological practices. Therefore, a comprehensive field trial was carried out to evaluate the potential of biostimulants in growth promotion across four districts of Maharashtra (Jalna, Ahmednagar, Aurangabad and Nasik). The study aimed to evaluate the candidacy of selected biostimulants in improving onion (Allium cepa L.) extracted from proprietary technology involving adaptive molecular re-engineering for plant growth biostimulants category. Three biostimulants were preliminary analyzed for their nutritional content. Compositional analysis revealed the presence of several macro, micronutrients as well as humic, fulvic acid. The concentration of humic and fulvic acid in sediment extract were ranged from 34-38 and 10.5-10.8 g/100g respectively. The organic carbon, total nitrogen, phosphorus, and ash contents ranged between 54-57,0.4-0.6, 0.3-0.4, and 3.3-7.2% respectively. Ash and total nitrogen content were the same for the extract 0.2% and 7.8% respectively. Onion crops were treated in three different modes, seed treatment, root drenching and foliar spray. Biostimulants were applied in combination with three different levels of chemical fertilizer 50%, 75%, and 100% RDF and compared with Control (100%RDF without biostimulants). Several qualitative and quantitative parameters such as firmness, pungency, neck diameter, bulb diameter, and yield were analysed. \nIt was observed that all three biostimulants (Asaava, Somrith, and Yuvaani) significantly(P<0.001) affected all the measured plant traits. In addition to this, overall, we found excess chemical fertilizer imposed adverse effect on plant growth parameters. Moreover, it was concluded that with seed treatment followed by root drenching and foliar spray and optimized dosage scheduling, yield can be further improved. The best effect in overall growth and yield potential of the plants were noticed in Asaava treated plants.","PeriodicalId":415976,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i4198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of agronomic activities, based on the use of biostimulants, is an important element of agroecological practices. Therefore, a comprehensive field trial was carried out to evaluate the potential of biostimulants in growth promotion across four districts of Maharashtra (Jalna, Ahmednagar, Aurangabad and Nasik). The study aimed to evaluate the candidacy of selected biostimulants in improving onion (Allium cepa L.) extracted from proprietary technology involving adaptive molecular re-engineering for plant growth biostimulants category. Three biostimulants were preliminary analyzed for their nutritional content. Compositional analysis revealed the presence of several macro, micronutrients as well as humic, fulvic acid. The concentration of humic and fulvic acid in sediment extract were ranged from 34-38 and 10.5-10.8 g/100g respectively. The organic carbon, total nitrogen, phosphorus, and ash contents ranged between 54-57,0.4-0.6, 0.3-0.4, and 3.3-7.2% respectively. Ash and total nitrogen content were the same for the extract 0.2% and 7.8% respectively. Onion crops were treated in three different modes, seed treatment, root drenching and foliar spray. Biostimulants were applied in combination with three different levels of chemical fertilizer 50%, 75%, and 100% RDF and compared with Control (100%RDF without biostimulants). Several qualitative and quantitative parameters such as firmness, pungency, neck diameter, bulb diameter, and yield were analysed. It was observed that all three biostimulants (Asaava, Somrith, and Yuvaani) significantly(P<0.001) affected all the measured plant traits. In addition to this, overall, we found excess chemical fertilizer imposed adverse effect on plant growth parameters. Moreover, it was concluded that with seed treatment followed by root drenching and foliar spray and optimized dosage scheduling, yield can be further improved. The best effect in overall growth and yield potential of the plants were noticed in Asaava treated plants.
洋葱(Allium cepa L.)低成本投入液中生物刺激素的评价马哈拉施特拉邦四个地区的种植:提供对与全球气候变化相关的非生物和生物胁迫的抗性或耐受性
以使用生物刺激剂为基础的农艺活动的实施是农业生态实践的一个重要组成部分。因此,在马哈拉施特拉邦(Jalna、Ahmednagar、Aurangabad和Nasik)的四个地区开展了一项全面的实地试验,以评估生物刺激剂促进生长的潜力。本研究旨在评价从专利技术中提取的洋葱(Allium cepa L.)生物刺激素对植物生长的适应性分子重组的候选性。初步分析了三种生物刺激素的营养成分。成分分析显示,土壤中含有多种宏、微量营养素以及腐植酸、黄腐酸。沉积物提取物中腐植酸和黄腐酸的浓度分别为34 ~ 38 g和10.5 ~ 10.8 g/100g。有机碳、全氮、全磷和灰分含量分别为54 ~ 57、0.4 ~ 0.6、0.3 ~ 0.4和3.3 ~ 7.2%。提取物的灰分和总氮含量分别为0.2%和7.8%。采用种子处理、根淋和叶面喷淋三种不同的方式处理洋葱作物。生物刺激剂与三种不同水平的化肥(50%、75%和100%RDF)联合施用,并与对照组(100%RDF不含生物刺激剂)进行比较。分析了松紧度、辣度、颈径、球茎直径、成品率等定性和定量参数。结果显示,三种生物刺激素(Asaava、Somrith和Yuvaani)均显著(P<0.001)影响了所测植物的所有性状。除此之外,总体而言,我们发现过量化肥对植物生长参数有不利影响。结果表明,先施种子后施根淋叶喷,优化施药计划,可进一步提高产量。以Asaava处理的植株整体生长和产量潜力效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信