Training Load and Match-Play Performance in Collegiate Division I Basketball

Adam J Petway
{"title":"Training Load and Match-Play Performance in Collegiate Division I Basketball","authors":"Adam J Petway","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study examined the relationship between training load and match-play team performance in the subsequent game. Methods: Training load for a NCAA Division I Basketball team was tracked over a 3-year period; 225 practices were observed and recorded. Training load was classified as total duration of training and duration of full-court 5-versus-5 (5v5) during training. In-game performance was tracked for 92 matches during this period. Training load was organized into 48-hours prior to competition (MD-2), 24-hours prior to competition (MD-1), Total Duration, Average Duration, Totals 5v5, and Average 5v5. Performance was determined on how the team faired against the closing point spread differential (CPSD). If the team performed above the CPSD it was considered an ABOVE performance, whereas if the team performed below the CPSD it was considered BELOW. A linear mixed model was used to assess the differences between ABOVE and BELOW performances. Cohen’s d effect sizes (ES) were calculated to determine the magnitude of the differences. Results: Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Both 5v5 MD-1 (p = 0.03; ES = -0.43) and Average 5v5 (p = 0.01; ES = -0.55) leading into matches was significantly greater for BELOW than ABOVE outcomes. Conclusion: 5v5 MD-1 and the Average 5v5 in preparation for competition had a significant impact on ensuing performances, whereas no significant difference was found in training MD-2. These findings could have implications on the sequencing of training sessions leading into competition. \n  \nKeywords: basketball training; team sports; duration; team performance; points spread \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the relationship between training load and match-play team performance in the subsequent game. Methods: Training load for a NCAA Division I Basketball team was tracked over a 3-year period; 225 practices were observed and recorded. Training load was classified as total duration of training and duration of full-court 5-versus-5 (5v5) during training. In-game performance was tracked for 92 matches during this period. Training load was organized into 48-hours prior to competition (MD-2), 24-hours prior to competition (MD-1), Total Duration, Average Duration, Totals 5v5, and Average 5v5. Performance was determined on how the team faired against the closing point spread differential (CPSD). If the team performed above the CPSD it was considered an ABOVE performance, whereas if the team performed below the CPSD it was considered BELOW. A linear mixed model was used to assess the differences between ABOVE and BELOW performances. Cohen’s d effect sizes (ES) were calculated to determine the magnitude of the differences. Results: Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Both 5v5 MD-1 (p = 0.03; ES = -0.43) and Average 5v5 (p = 0.01; ES = -0.55) leading into matches was significantly greater for BELOW than ABOVE outcomes. Conclusion: 5v5 MD-1 and the Average 5v5 in preparation for competition had a significant impact on ensuing performances, whereas no significant difference was found in training MD-2. These findings could have implications on the sequencing of training sessions leading into competition.   Keywords: basketball training; team sports; duration; team performance; points spread    
大学甲组篮球训练负荷与对抗赛表现
目的:本研究探讨训练负荷与对抗赛队伍在后续比赛中的表现之间的关系。方法:对一支NCAA一级篮球队进行为期3年的训练负荷跟踪;观察并记录225例实践。训练负荷分为总训练时间和训练中全场5对5 (5v5)的持续时间。在此期间,我们追踪了92场比赛的游戏表现。训练负荷分为比赛前48小时(MD-2)、比赛前24小时(MD-1)、总时长、平均时长、总5v5和平均5v5。球队的表现取决于他们在接近点差(CPSD)时的表现。如果团队的表现高于CPSD,则被认为是高于CPSD,而如果团队的表现低于CPSD,则被认为是低于CPSD。采用线性混合模型来评估ABOVE和BELOW性能之间的差异。计算科恩效应量(ES)来确定差异的大小。结果:p≤0.05有统计学意义。5v5 MD-1 (p = 0.03;ES = -0.43),平均值为5v5 (p = 0.01;ES = -0.55)显著高于以上结果。结论:5v5 MD-1和平均5v5在赛前准备阶段对随后的表现有显著影响,而在训练MD-2阶段无显著差异。这些发现可能会对比赛前的训练顺序产生影响。关键词:篮球训练;团队运动;持续时间;团队绩效;点传播
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信