Balanced Scorecard in an Indian Public Sector Enterprise – A Framework for Implementation

M. Mahesha, R. Karthikeyan
{"title":"Balanced Scorecard in an Indian Public Sector Enterprise – A Framework for Implementation","authors":"M. Mahesha, R. Karthikeyan","doi":"10.17697/ibmrd/2018/v7i2/130478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of any public sector enterprise is criticized on the basis of their poor performance in terms of profit or rate of return on capital investment. The main aspect for judging the poor performance of the enterprise is based on the financial measures used in the evaluation of the performance. The rel evance of using only the financial measures or results is questionable and lacks futuristic perspective. The performance of the enterprise may even get worse, when the management lacks strategic perspective or focuses only on short term goals instead of long term goals. The strategic objectives can’t be realised if only the financial performance or results like profit margin, EBIT, Cash flow etc are used for the per formance measurement. The financial results are the consequences and not the goals or objectives to be achieved. Way back in early 1990’s, Mr Robert Kaplan and Mr David Norton has developed the Balanced Scorecard concept as a framework to measure the non-financial performance of a private industry. Originally it was developed as a means to communicate company strategy, to align unit and individual goals to strategy, to link objectives to long term targets and budgets and to conduct performance reviews to improve strategy of the organisation. Over the time, the balanced scorecard concept has undergone metamorphosis and has developed into a complete performance management system including the management and execution of the corporate strategy. The balanced scorecard breaks down the Vision, Mission and strategy of the organisation","PeriodicalId":183686,"journal":{"name":"IBMRD's Journal of Management & Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBMRD's Journal of Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd/2018/v7i2/130478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of any public sector enterprise is criticized on the basis of their poor performance in terms of profit or rate of return on capital investment. The main aspect for judging the poor performance of the enterprise is based on the financial measures used in the evaluation of the performance. The rel evance of using only the financial measures or results is questionable and lacks futuristic perspective. The performance of the enterprise may even get worse, when the management lacks strategic perspective or focuses only on short term goals instead of long term goals. The strategic objectives can’t be realised if only the financial performance or results like profit margin, EBIT, Cash flow etc are used for the per formance measurement. The financial results are the consequences and not the goals or objectives to be achieved. Way back in early 1990’s, Mr Robert Kaplan and Mr David Norton has developed the Balanced Scorecard concept as a framework to measure the non-financial performance of a private industry. Originally it was developed as a means to communicate company strategy, to align unit and individual goals to strategy, to link objectives to long term targets and budgets and to conduct performance reviews to improve strategy of the organisation. Over the time, the balanced scorecard concept has undergone metamorphosis and has developed into a complete performance management system including the management and execution of the corporate strategy. The balanced scorecard breaks down the Vision, Mission and strategy of the organisation
印度公共部门企业平衡计分卡的实施框架
任何公共部门企业的业绩都因其在利润或资本投资回报率方面的表现不佳而受到批评。判断企业不良绩效的主要方面是基于绩效评价中使用的财务指标。仅使用财务指标或结果的相关性值得怀疑,而且缺乏未来的观点。当管理层缺乏战略眼光或只关注短期目标而不关注长期目标时,企业的绩效甚至可能会变得更差。如果仅使用财务业绩或利润率、息税前利润、现金流等结果来衡量绩效,则无法实现战略目标。财务结果是结果,而不是要实现的目标或目的。早在上世纪90年代初,罗伯特•卡普兰(Robert Kaplan)和戴维•诺顿(David Norton)就提出了平衡计分卡概念,作为衡量私营企业非财务绩效的框架。最初,它是作为一种沟通公司战略的手段,使单位和个人的目标与战略保持一致,将目标与长期目标和预算联系起来,并进行绩效评估以改进组织的战略。随着时间的推移,平衡计分卡的概念经历了蜕变,并发展成为一个完整的绩效管理体系,包括企业战略的管理和执行。平衡计分卡分解组织的愿景、使命和战略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信