Shackled to the Status Quo: A Replication

Binny M. Samuel, Geo Joy
{"title":"Shackled to the Status Quo: A Replication","authors":"Binny M. Samuel, Geo Joy","doi":"10.17705/1ATRR.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a methodological replication of the Polites and Karahanna (2012) model of incumbent system influence on switching to a new Information System using e-mail systems Gmail and Inbox as the incumbent and new systems, respectively. Our replication results support much of the original study. Inertia to use the existing system significantly affected intentions to use the new system. Inertia also affected perceptions of the new system (perceived ease of use and relative advantage) which in turn affected intentions. We found a few differences from the original study and highlight what we consider the major ones. First, the original study found that sunk costs, incumbent system habit, and transition costs all significantly influenced inertia, whereas we found that only sunk costs had a significant influence on inertia. We attribute this to the differences in technologies studied; the original study examined a technology that required a change in both software and work processes whereas we studied a technology switch that only required a change in software (no major change in work processes). Second, the original study found a complex two-part moderation of inertia on the relationship between subjective norm and intentions, while we found a simple direct effect of subjective norm on intentions with no moderation. We also attribute this to the differences in technologies studied; the original study examined a technology that required mutual switch by two parties whereas we studied a technology that required a switch by only one.","PeriodicalId":146711,"journal":{"name":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1ATRR.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We conducted a methodological replication of the Polites and Karahanna (2012) model of incumbent system influence on switching to a new Information System using e-mail systems Gmail and Inbox as the incumbent and new systems, respectively. Our replication results support much of the original study. Inertia to use the existing system significantly affected intentions to use the new system. Inertia also affected perceptions of the new system (perceived ease of use and relative advantage) which in turn affected intentions. We found a few differences from the original study and highlight what we consider the major ones. First, the original study found that sunk costs, incumbent system habit, and transition costs all significantly influenced inertia, whereas we found that only sunk costs had a significant influence on inertia. We attribute this to the differences in technologies studied; the original study examined a technology that required a change in both software and work processes whereas we studied a technology switch that only required a change in software (no major change in work processes). Second, the original study found a complex two-part moderation of inertia on the relationship between subjective norm and intentions, while we found a simple direct effect of subjective norm on intentions with no moderation. We also attribute this to the differences in technologies studied; the original study examined a technology that required mutual switch by two parties whereas we studied a technology that required a switch by only one.
束缚于现状:一种复制
我们对Polites和Karahanna(2012)的现有系统对转换到新信息系统的影响模型进行了方法复制,分别使用电子邮件系统Gmail和收件箱作为现有系统和新系统。我们的复制结果支持了原始研究的大部分内容。使用现有系统的惯性极大地影响了使用新系统的意图。惯性还影响对新系统的看法(认为使用方便和相对优势),这反过来又影响意图。我们发现了与原始研究的一些差异,并强调了我们认为的主要差异。首先,原始研究发现沉没成本、在职制度习惯和过渡成本都显著影响惯性,而我们发现只有沉没成本对惯性有显著影响。我们将此归因于所研究技术的差异;最初的研究检查了一种需要在软件和工作过程中进行更改的技术,而我们研究了一种只需要在软件中进行更改的技术切换(在工作过程中没有重大更改)。第二,原始研究发现惯性对主观规范与意图之间的关系具有复杂的两部分调节作用,而主观规范对意图的影响是简单的直接影响,没有调节作用。我们还将此归因于所研究技术的差异;最初的研究研究了一种需要双方相互切换的技术,而我们研究的是一种只需要一方切换的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信