Do credit market incentives drive classification shifting in emerging markets?

Mani Bansal
{"title":"Do credit market incentives drive classification shifting in emerging markets?","authors":"Mani Bansal","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-01-2023-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTo report inflated operating performance indicators, such as operating revenue and operating profit, managers vertically reposition revenue and expense items inside the income statement. This study aims to investigate the relationship between credit market incentives and these practices.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study examined a sample of 1,592 Bombay Stock Exchange-listed companies from 2009 to 2021 and tested them using panel data regression models. The propensity score matching method and different measurements of classification shifting practices are used to validate the results.\n\n\nFindings\nThe conclusions drawn from the empirical data show that firms prefer revenue shifting over expense shifting to prevent debt covenant violations. It shows that the firm’s classification-shifting practices are driven by credit market incentives. This finding is consistent with the notion of positive accounting theory that firms engage in classification shifting (earnings management) to avoid violation of debt covenants. Further, the firm’s preference for revenue shifting is in line with the ease-need-advantage-based shifting framework where firms choose the shifting tool based on costs and constraints associated with each tool.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe finding suggests that if managers heavily rely on revenue shifting to avoid debt covenant violations, the firm may end up breaking these covenants based on its actual operating performance. Managers may use aggressive accounting techniques to prevent covenant violations, which can be a warning indicator of financial difficulties or operational problems. It highlights the necessity for creditors and investors to carefully evaluate a company’s financial stability outside of the financial statements that are publicly disclosed. Authorities should create separate forensic accounting standards for auditors to check revenue items and stop the corporate misfeasance of revenue shifting.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is among the earlier attempts to provide empirical evidence on credit market incentives behind classification shifting practices. It is the first study that documents the substitution relationship between classification shifting forms for avoiding violation of debt covenants.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-01-2023-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To report inflated operating performance indicators, such as operating revenue and operating profit, managers vertically reposition revenue and expense items inside the income statement. This study aims to investigate the relationship between credit market incentives and these practices. Design/methodology/approach This study examined a sample of 1,592 Bombay Stock Exchange-listed companies from 2009 to 2021 and tested them using panel data regression models. The propensity score matching method and different measurements of classification shifting practices are used to validate the results. Findings The conclusions drawn from the empirical data show that firms prefer revenue shifting over expense shifting to prevent debt covenant violations. It shows that the firm’s classification-shifting practices are driven by credit market incentives. This finding is consistent with the notion of positive accounting theory that firms engage in classification shifting (earnings management) to avoid violation of debt covenants. Further, the firm’s preference for revenue shifting is in line with the ease-need-advantage-based shifting framework where firms choose the shifting tool based on costs and constraints associated with each tool. Practical implications The finding suggests that if managers heavily rely on revenue shifting to avoid debt covenant violations, the firm may end up breaking these covenants based on its actual operating performance. Managers may use aggressive accounting techniques to prevent covenant violations, which can be a warning indicator of financial difficulties or operational problems. It highlights the necessity for creditors and investors to carefully evaluate a company’s financial stability outside of the financial statements that are publicly disclosed. Authorities should create separate forensic accounting standards for auditors to check revenue items and stop the corporate misfeasance of revenue shifting. Originality/value The study is among the earlier attempts to provide empirical evidence on credit market incentives behind classification shifting practices. It is the first study that documents the substitution relationship between classification shifting forms for avoiding violation of debt covenants.
信贷市场激励是否推动了新兴市场的分类转变?
目的为了报告虚增的经营业绩指标,如营业收入和营业利润,管理者在损益表中垂直地重新定位收入和费用项目。本研究旨在探讨信贷市场激励与这些做法之间的关系。本研究对2009年至2021年期间在孟买证券交易所上市的1592家公司进行了抽样调查,并使用面板数据回归模型进行了测试。采用倾向得分匹配法和不同的分类转移实践测量来验证结果。从实证数据得出的结论表明,企业更倾向于收入转移而不是费用转移来防止债务契约违约。它表明,该公司的分类转换行为是由信贷市场激励驱动的。这一发现与积极会计理论的概念是一致的,即公司从事分类转移(盈余管理)以避免违反债务契约。此外,企业对收入转移的偏好与基于简单需求优势的转移框架一致,在这种框架下,企业根据成本和与每种工具相关的约束来选择转移工具。实际意义该发现表明,如果管理者严重依赖收入转移来避免违反债务契约,那么公司最终可能会根据其实际经营业绩而违反这些契约。管理人员可能会使用激进的会计技术来防止违反契约,这可能是财务困难或业务问题的警告指标。它强调了债权人和投资者在公开披露的财务报表之外仔细评估公司财务稳定性的必要性。当局应该制定单独的法务会计准则,让审计人员检查收入项目,阻止企业转移收入的不当行为。原创性/价值这项研究是早期尝试提供信用市场激励背后的分类转换做法的经验证据之一。这是第一个记录了避免违反债务契约的分类转换形式之间的替代关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信