Energy Consumption Improvement of Shared-Cache Multicore Clusters Based on Explicit Simultaneous Multithreading

M. Souza, T. T. Cota, Matheus M. Queiroz, H. Freitas
{"title":"Energy Consumption Improvement of Shared-Cache Multicore Clusters Based on Explicit Simultaneous Multithreading","authors":"M. Souza, T. T. Cota, Matheus M. Queiroz, H. Freitas","doi":"10.1109/SBAC-PADW.2017.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of multicore clusters is one of the strategies used to achieve energy-efficient multicore architecture designs. Even though chips have multiple cores in these designs, cache constraints such as size, latency, concurrency, and scalability still apply. Multicore clusters must therefore implement alternative solutions to the shared cache access problem. Bigger or more frequently accessed caches consume more energy, which is a problem in explicit multithread concurrency. In this work, we simulate different multicore cluster architectures to identify the best configuration in terms of energy efficiency, concerning a varying number of cores, cache sizes and sharing strategies. We also observe the simultaneous and individual multithreading concurrency of two application groups. The results showed that for applications with regular tasks loads, the simultaneous multithreading approach was 43.6% better than the individual one, in terms of energy consumption. For irregular tasks loads, individual executions proved to be the best option, with an increase of up to 81.3% in energy efficiency. We also concluded that shared L2 caches were up to 13.4% more energy-efficient than private cache configurations.","PeriodicalId":325990,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing Workshops (SBAC-PADW)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing Workshops (SBAC-PADW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBAC-PADW.2017.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of multicore clusters is one of the strategies used to achieve energy-efficient multicore architecture designs. Even though chips have multiple cores in these designs, cache constraints such as size, latency, concurrency, and scalability still apply. Multicore clusters must therefore implement alternative solutions to the shared cache access problem. Bigger or more frequently accessed caches consume more energy, which is a problem in explicit multithread concurrency. In this work, we simulate different multicore cluster architectures to identify the best configuration in terms of energy efficiency, concerning a varying number of cores, cache sizes and sharing strategies. We also observe the simultaneous and individual multithreading concurrency of two application groups. The results showed that for applications with regular tasks loads, the simultaneous multithreading approach was 43.6% better than the individual one, in terms of energy consumption. For irregular tasks loads, individual executions proved to be the best option, with an increase of up to 81.3% in energy efficiency. We also concluded that shared L2 caches were up to 13.4% more energy-efficient than private cache configurations.
基于显式同步多线程的共享缓存多核集群能耗改进
多核集群的使用是实现节能多核架构设计的策略之一。即使芯片在这些设计中有多个核心,缓存限制(如大小、延迟、并发性和可伸缩性)仍然适用。因此,多核集群必须实现共享缓存访问问题的替代解决方案。更大或更频繁访问的缓存消耗更多的能量,这在显式多线程并发性中是一个问题。在这项工作中,我们模拟了不同的多核集群架构,以确定在能源效率方面的最佳配置,涉及不同数量的核心,缓存大小和共享策略。我们还观察了两个应用程序组的同时和单独的多线程并发性。结果表明,对于具有常规任务负载的应用程序,同步多线程方法在能耗方面比单个多线程方法好43.6%。对于不规则的任务负载,单个执行被证明是最佳选择,其能源效率提高高达81.3%。我们还得出结论,与私有缓存配置相比,共享L2缓存的能效最高可提高13.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信