{"title":"First records of Hemicyclops tanakai Itoh and Nishida, 2002 and Tisbe ensifer Fischer, 1860 (Crustacea, Copepoda) in Korea","authors":"T. Karanovic, Wonchoel Lee","doi":"10.12651/JSR.2016.5.3.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Korea has become one of the most actively re searched areas for invertebrate diversity in the last de cade or so, mostly thanks to the efforts of the National Institute of Biological Resources in Incheon and sup porting funding from the Korean Ministry of Environ ment (Lee and Karanovic, 2012). According to the most current review (Cho et al., 2011), the national inventory of Korea totals 36,921 species, consisting of 5,230 vas cular plants and bryophytes, 4,587 algae, 4,085 fungi and lichens, 1,374 protists, 647 prokaryotes, 1,841 ver tebrates, 13,384 insects, and 5,773 invertebrates other than insects. Copepods are relatively well studied here, both as freeliving forms in marine (Soh, 2010; Lee et al., 2012) and freshwater environments (Chang, 2009; 2010), as well as parasites of other organisms (Kim, 2008). However, surveys of marginal and previously understudied habitats (Karanovic et al., 2012a; 2012b; Karanovic, 2014) or utilization of novel taxonomic methods, such as studies of microstructures (Karanovic and Cho, 2012; Karanovic and Lee, 2012; Karanovic et al., 2013) and DNA (Karanovic and Kim, 2014a; Kim et al., 2014; Karanovic et al., 2014; 2015), have resulted in numerous recent additions to the Korean copepod fauna. While most of the recent additions are endemic elements (see also Chang and Lee, 2012; Kim et al., 2014) some are actually elements of neighbouring faunas that were previously unknown here (Kim et al., 2011; Park and Lee, 2011; Nam and Lee, 2012; Park et al., 2012). Two copepod species that we report in this paper belong to the latter group. They were both collected in very small numbers and in a single location each, so their optimal ecological niche and/or season in Korea remain to be determined. To provide a wider perspective for our re cords we discuss systematic positions and taxonomic problems of the two species reported. Journal of Species Research 5(3):289299, 2016","PeriodicalId":426231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of species research","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of species research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12651/JSR.2016.5.3.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
South Korea has become one of the most actively re searched areas for invertebrate diversity in the last de cade or so, mostly thanks to the efforts of the National Institute of Biological Resources in Incheon and sup porting funding from the Korean Ministry of Environ ment (Lee and Karanovic, 2012). According to the most current review (Cho et al., 2011), the national inventory of Korea totals 36,921 species, consisting of 5,230 vas cular plants and bryophytes, 4,587 algae, 4,085 fungi and lichens, 1,374 protists, 647 prokaryotes, 1,841 ver tebrates, 13,384 insects, and 5,773 invertebrates other than insects. Copepods are relatively well studied here, both as freeliving forms in marine (Soh, 2010; Lee et al., 2012) and freshwater environments (Chang, 2009; 2010), as well as parasites of other organisms (Kim, 2008). However, surveys of marginal and previously understudied habitats (Karanovic et al., 2012a; 2012b; Karanovic, 2014) or utilization of novel taxonomic methods, such as studies of microstructures (Karanovic and Cho, 2012; Karanovic and Lee, 2012; Karanovic et al., 2013) and DNA (Karanovic and Kim, 2014a; Kim et al., 2014; Karanovic et al., 2014; 2015), have resulted in numerous recent additions to the Korean copepod fauna. While most of the recent additions are endemic elements (see also Chang and Lee, 2012; Kim et al., 2014) some are actually elements of neighbouring faunas that were previously unknown here (Kim et al., 2011; Park and Lee, 2011; Nam and Lee, 2012; Park et al., 2012). Two copepod species that we report in this paper belong to the latter group. They were both collected in very small numbers and in a single location each, so their optimal ecological niche and/or season in Korea remain to be determined. To provide a wider perspective for our re cords we discuss systematic positions and taxonomic problems of the two species reported. Journal of Species Research 5(3):289299, 2016
韩国甲壳纲桡足目半独足目(tanakai Itoh and Nishida, 2002)和Tisbe ensifer Fischer(1860)的首次记录
在过去十年左右的时间里,韩国已成为无脊椎动物多样性研究最活跃的地区之一,这主要归功于仁川国家生物资源研究所的努力和韩国环境部的支持资金(Lee和Karanovic, 2012)。根据最新的综述(Cho et al., 2011),韩国的全国物种总数为36,921种,包括5,230种蕨类植物和苔藓植物,4,587种藻类,4,085种真菌和地衣,1,374种原生生物,647种原核生物,1,841种脊椎动物,13,384种昆虫和5,773种昆虫以外的无脊椎动物。桡足类动物在这里的研究相对较好,它们都是海洋中的自由生活形式(Soh, 2010;Lee et al., 2012)和淡水环境(Chang, 2009;2010),以及其他生物的寄生虫(Kim, 2008)。然而,对边缘和以前未充分研究的栖息地的调查(Karanovic et al., 2012a;2012 b;Karanovic, 2014)或利用新的分类学方法,如微观结构的研究(Karanovic和Cho, 2012;Karanovic and Lee, 2012;Karanovic et al., 2013)和DNA (Karanovic and Kim, 2014a;Kim et al., 2014;Karanovic et al., 2014;2015年),导致韩国桡足动物群最近增加了许多。虽然最近增加的大多数是地方性元素(参见Chang和Lee, 2012;Kim et al., 2014)有些实际上是以前不知道的邻近动物群的元素(Kim et al., 2011;Park and Lee, 2011;Nam and Lee, 2012;Park et al., 2012)。本文报道的两种桡足动物属于后者。它们的数量都非常少,而且都在一个地点采集,因此它们在韩国的最佳生态位和/或季节仍有待确定。为了给我们的记录提供一个更广阔的视角,我们讨论了所报道的两种的系统位置和分类学问题。物种研究5(3):289-299,2016