Features of the poetics of the medieval collection of prose "Roman Deeds" (studying a new book by Svetlana Neretina "No word is better than another". Philosophy and Literature")

V. Rozin
{"title":"Features of the poetics of the medieval collection of prose \"Roman Deeds\" (studying a new book by Svetlana Neretina \"No word is better than another\". Philosophy and Literature\")","authors":"V. Rozin","doi":"10.7256/2454-0625.2022.8.38564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article offers an analysis of the poetics of the collection of prose \"Roman Deeds\", which the author considers as an addition to the study of S.S. Neretina. First, the methodology of studying medieval texts, which is discussed in the \"Preface\" to the book, is briefly characterized, and two stories from the collection are given as cases. Neretina argues that the \"Roman Acts\" expresses the world of medieval culture and within it the reality of statements relating to philosophy and what we could call medieval art. The mechanism of creating short stories from the \"Roman Acts\" is analyzed, including, firstly, a statement beginning with a sound, opening the way to meaning and things, secondly, the disclosure of the hidden as a creation of an independent reality (science, art, etc.), thirdly, the use of tropes in the course of constructing a multi-valued medieval reality.   The author shows that the picture drawn by Neretina well explains the ambiguity of reality, which is important for medieval thinking, however, the explanation of the features of the content of the stories of the \"Roman Deeds\" is not understood by her on the basis of the picture drawn in the \"Preface\"; they are interpreted from the point of view of the structure of medieval culture. Then the author discusses the concepts of reality and ambiguity that aroused his interest. At the same time, he already uses his own ideas obtained in the analysis of art. The author explains the differences in the interpretation of the \"Roman Acts\" by the discrepancy of discourses and views of researchers, which, in his opinion, is completely normal and serves for the benefit of thinking.\n","PeriodicalId":184304,"journal":{"name":"Культура и искусство","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Культура и искусство","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2022.8.38564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the poetics of the collection of prose "Roman Deeds", which the author considers as an addition to the study of S.S. Neretina. First, the methodology of studying medieval texts, which is discussed in the "Preface" to the book, is briefly characterized, and two stories from the collection are given as cases. Neretina argues that the "Roman Acts" expresses the world of medieval culture and within it the reality of statements relating to philosophy and what we could call medieval art. The mechanism of creating short stories from the "Roman Acts" is analyzed, including, firstly, a statement beginning with a sound, opening the way to meaning and things, secondly, the disclosure of the hidden as a creation of an independent reality (science, art, etc.), thirdly, the use of tropes in the course of constructing a multi-valued medieval reality.   The author shows that the picture drawn by Neretina well explains the ambiguity of reality, which is important for medieval thinking, however, the explanation of the features of the content of the stories of the "Roman Deeds" is not understood by her on the basis of the picture drawn in the "Preface"; they are interpreted from the point of view of the structure of medieval culture. Then the author discusses the concepts of reality and ambiguity that aroused his interest. At the same time, he already uses his own ideas obtained in the analysis of art. The author explains the differences in the interpretation of the "Roman Acts" by the discrepancy of discourses and views of researchers, which, in his opinion, is completely normal and serves for the benefit of thinking.
中世纪散文集《罗马事迹》的诗学特征(研究Svetlana Neretina的新书《没有比另一个更好的词》)。哲学与文学”)
本文对散文集《罗马事迹》的诗学进行了分析,认为这是对涅列蒂娜研究的补充。首先,简要介绍了本书“前言”中讨论的中世纪文本研究方法,并以选集中的两个故事为例。涅列蒂娜认为,“罗马行为”表达了中世纪文化的世界,在其中,与哲学和我们可以称之为中世纪艺术有关的陈述的现实。分析了《罗马行为》短篇小说的创作机制,首先是一种以声音开头的陈述,打开了通往意义和事物的道路;其次是作为一种独立的现实(科学、艺术等)的创造而揭示了隐藏的东西;第三,在构建多重价值的中世纪现实的过程中使用了比喻。作者认为涅列蒂娜所描绘的画面很好地解释了现实的模糊性,这对中世纪的思维是很重要的,但她并没有根据《序言》所描绘的画面来理解《罗马事迹》故事内容的特点;它们是从中世纪文化结构的角度来解释的。然后,作者讨论了引起他兴趣的现实和模糊的概念。同时,他已经运用自己在艺术分析中获得的想法。笔者从研究者的话语和观点的差异来解释“罗马行传”解释的差异,在他看来,这是完全正常的,有利于思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信