THE POLICY OF POLAND AND ROMANIA ON THE INTERNED ARMY OF THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC (1921–1924): UKRAINIAN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY

M. Stopchak
{"title":"THE POLICY OF POLAND AND ROMANIA ON THE INTERNED ARMY OF THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC (1921–1924): UKRAINIAN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY","authors":"M. Stopchak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2022-33-76-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians on the policy of the leadership of Poland and Romania during 1921–1924 regarding the Army of the Ukrainian People’s Republic interned in the camps of these countries. General scientific and special research methods were used in solving the set tasks: historiographical analysis and synthesis, generalization, quantitative, historical-comparative, etc. The conceptual approaches and techniques used by Ukrainian foreign experts to scientifically reconstruct this policy were clarified. It is shown that Ukrainian foreign historians rejected the ideologically biased conclusions of Soviet historiography regarding the policy of the Polish and Romanian leadership towards the interned Army of the UPR, preparing a number of works in which this problem was covered at a higher scientific level. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. A characteristic feature of these works in the interwar period was the simple statement of more or less favorable attitude of the governments of Poland and Romania to interned soldiers, emphasizing that Poles and Romanians helped the interned Army of the UPR, pursuing their own political goals. At the same time, this problem was considered by the authors of the publications not directly, but in the context of a wider palette of camp issues. The analytical component of such publications was low. It is emphasized that Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, at a higher analytical level analyzed the policy of Polish leaders regarding the interned Army of the UPR. However, the attitude of the Romanian authorities towards interned Ukrainian soldiers generally fell out of sight of Ukrainian foreign researchers of the postwar period. A general conclusion is made that in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians the policy of Polish and Romanian government circles regarding the interned Army of the Ukrainian People’s Republic on their territory was not considered a complete scientific problem. As a rule, the desire of the politicians of these countries to use the military potential of the Ukrainian army to solve their own problems in relations with Soviet Russia was stated, but without a sufficient analysis of the circumstances that determined the direction of such a policy. In addition, the analysis of the research topic showed a clear bias towards the coverage of the policy of the Polish leadership towards Ukrainian soldiers interned on its territory. Romania's position on this issue was covered only in isolated works, which significantly impoverished the historiography of the problem as a whole.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2022-33-76-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians on the policy of the leadership of Poland and Romania during 1921–1924 regarding the Army of the Ukrainian People’s Republic interned in the camps of these countries. General scientific and special research methods were used in solving the set tasks: historiographical analysis and synthesis, generalization, quantitative, historical-comparative, etc. The conceptual approaches and techniques used by Ukrainian foreign experts to scientifically reconstruct this policy were clarified. It is shown that Ukrainian foreign historians rejected the ideologically biased conclusions of Soviet historiography regarding the policy of the Polish and Romanian leadership towards the interned Army of the UPR, preparing a number of works in which this problem was covered at a higher scientific level. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. A characteristic feature of these works in the interwar period was the simple statement of more or less favorable attitude of the governments of Poland and Romania to interned soldiers, emphasizing that Poles and Romanians helped the interned Army of the UPR, pursuing their own political goals. At the same time, this problem was considered by the authors of the publications not directly, but in the context of a wider palette of camp issues. The analytical component of such publications was low. It is emphasized that Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, at a higher analytical level analyzed the policy of Polish leaders regarding the interned Army of the UPR. However, the attitude of the Romanian authorities towards interned Ukrainian soldiers generally fell out of sight of Ukrainian foreign researchers of the postwar period. A general conclusion is made that in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians the policy of Polish and Romanian government circles regarding the interned Army of the Ukrainian People’s Republic on their territory was not considered a complete scientific problem. As a rule, the desire of the politicians of these countries to use the military potential of the Ukrainian army to solve their own problems in relations with Soviet Russia was stated, but without a sufficient analysis of the circumstances that determined the direction of such a policy. In addition, the analysis of the research topic showed a clear bias towards the coverage of the policy of the Polish leadership towards Ukrainian soldiers interned on its territory. Romania's position on this issue was covered only in isolated works, which significantly impoverished the historiography of the problem as a whole.
波兰和罗马尼亚对乌克兰人民共和国被拘禁军队的政策(1921-1924):乌克兰外国史学
本文分析了乌克兰外国历史学家关于波兰和罗马尼亚领导人在1921-1924年期间对被这些国家集中营关押的乌克兰人民共和国军队的政策的史学成就。在解决既定任务时,采用了一般的科学研究方法和特殊的研究方法:史学分析和综合、概括、定量、历史比较等。澄清了乌克兰外国专家为科学地重建这一政策所使用的概念方法和技术。报告显示,乌克兰的外国历史学家拒绝接受苏联史学关于波兰和罗马尼亚领导人对普遍定期审议中被拘禁的军队的政策的意识形态上的偏见结论,并编写了一些在更高科学水平上讨论这个问题的著作。值得注意的是,并非所有的作品都涵盖了同样的研究问题。在两次世界大战期间,这些作品的一个特点是波兰和罗马尼亚政府对被拘留士兵或多或少的有利态度的简单陈述,强调波兰人和罗马尼亚人帮助被拘留的普遍定期审议军队追求自己的政治目标。同时,这些出版物的作者不是直接考虑这个问题,而是在更广泛的营地问题的背景下考虑这个问题。这类出版物的分析成分很低。强调的是,战后时期的乌克兰外国历史学家对所研究的问题离开了对众所周知的事实的简单而简洁的陈述,在更高的分析层面上分析了波兰领导人关于普遍定期审议的被拘留军队的政策。然而,罗马尼亚当局对被拘留的乌克兰士兵的态度,在战后时期的乌克兰外国研究人员的视野中普遍消失了。总的结论是,在乌克兰外国历史学家的著作中,波兰和罗马尼亚政府界对乌克兰人民共和国在其领土上被拘禁的军队的政策不被认为是一个完全科学的问题。通常,这些国家的政治家希望利用乌克兰军队的军事潜力来解决他们与苏俄关系中的问题,但没有对决定这种政策方向的情况进行充分的分析。此外,对研究主题的分析表明,波兰领导人对在其领土上被拘留的乌克兰士兵的政策的报道明显存在偏见。罗马尼亚对这一问题的立场只在个别的著作中提到,这大大削弱了对整个问题的历史研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信