Design and analysis of multiple-bus arbiters with different priority schemes

Qing Yang, R. Raja
{"title":"Design and analysis of multiple-bus arbiters with different priority schemes","authors":"Qing Yang, R. Raja","doi":"10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present four multiple-user and multiple-server arbiter designs of multiple-bus multiprocessors. All designs are based on decentralized control, which has the advantage of good reliability and potentially high throughput. The priority protocols considered are fixed priority, rotating priority, round-robin priority, and equal priority. For the first two priority protocols, lookahead techniques are used to speed up the arbitration process. The round-robin protocol is based on the decentralized daisy-chain idea and is operated in an asynchronous fashion. Analytical models are developed for the four different priority protocols to evaluate the performance of the different designs. The analyses are based on a probabilistic model for the synchronous case and simple queuing analysis for the asynchronous system. Numerical results obtained from the proposed model show that the equal priority protocol performs better than the others in the system with a few buses. The performance difference is not significant when the number of buses is relatively large.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":389644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The authors present four multiple-user and multiple-server arbiter designs of multiple-bus multiprocessors. All designs are based on decentralized control, which has the advantage of good reliability and potentially high throughput. The priority protocols considered are fixed priority, rotating priority, round-robin priority, and equal priority. For the first two priority protocols, lookahead techniques are used to speed up the arbitration process. The round-robin protocol is based on the decentralized daisy-chain idea and is operated in an asynchronous fashion. Analytical models are developed for the four different priority protocols to evaluate the performance of the different designs. The analyses are based on a probabilistic model for the synchronous case and simple queuing analysis for the asynchronous system. Numerical results obtained from the proposed model show that the equal priority protocol performs better than the others in the system with a few buses. The performance difference is not significant when the number of buses is relatively large.<>
不同优先级方案的多总线仲裁器设计与分析
作者提出了多总线多处理器的四种多用户和多服务器仲裁器设计。所有的设计都基于分散控制,具有可靠性好和潜在的高吞吐量的优点。考虑的优先级协议有固定优先级、旋转优先级、轮循优先级和等优先级。对于前两种优先级协议,使用向前看技术来加快仲裁过程。轮询协议基于去中心化的菊花链思想,并以异步方式操作。建立了四种不同优先级协议的分析模型,以评估不同设计的性能。分析基于同步情况的概率模型和异步系统的简单排队分析。数值结果表明,在总线较少的情况下,等优先级协议的性能优于其他协议。当总线数量较大时,性能差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信