Multi-Modal Human-Machine Control Interfaces of Upper Limb Motorized Exoskeletons for Severely Impaired Patients

S. D. Gasperina, M. Gandolla, A. Calcagno, Andrea Costa, L. Aquilante, M. Puchinger, M. Gföhler, F. Braghin, A. Pedrocchi
{"title":"Multi-Modal Human-Machine Control Interfaces of Upper Limb Motorized Exoskeletons for Severely Impaired Patients","authors":"S. D. Gasperina, M. Gandolla, A. Calcagno, Andrea Costa, L. Aquilante, M. Puchinger, M. Gföhler, F. Braghin, A. Pedrocchi","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study concerns the evaluation and comparison of different Human-Machine Interfaces for the control of an upper limb motorized exoskeleton for severely impaired patients. Different approaches (i.e. manual, vocal, visual control) are tested in a simulation environment on three subjects affected by muscular dystrophy with the aim of assessing the capability of the system to interact with the user and vice versa. A Graphical User Interface shows the simulated behavior of the exoskeleton to the user which has to perform reaching tasks in the space by moving the exoskeleton end-effector to defined virtual targets that are displayed on the screen. Specific assessment of the interaction of the user with each control interface is achieved, while a quantitative evaluation of the usability of all the three approaches is provided by a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. All patients were able to interact with all control interfaces without difficulties and to complete reaching tasks in simulation. SUS scores showed overall good usability of the Human-Machine Control Interfaces suggesting that the manual and the vocal control interfaces are preferred by the subjects.","PeriodicalId":382522,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The aim of this study concerns the evaluation and comparison of different Human-Machine Interfaces for the control of an upper limb motorized exoskeleton for severely impaired patients. Different approaches (i.e. manual, vocal, visual control) are tested in a simulation environment on three subjects affected by muscular dystrophy with the aim of assessing the capability of the system to interact with the user and vice versa. A Graphical User Interface shows the simulated behavior of the exoskeleton to the user which has to perform reaching tasks in the space by moving the exoskeleton end-effector to defined virtual targets that are displayed on the screen. Specific assessment of the interaction of the user with each control interface is achieved, while a quantitative evaluation of the usability of all the three approaches is provided by a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. All patients were able to interact with all control interfaces without difficulties and to complete reaching tasks in simulation. SUS scores showed overall good usability of the Human-Machine Control Interfaces suggesting that the manual and the vocal control interfaces are preferred by the subjects.
重度损伤患者上肢电动外骨骼多模态人机控制接口
本研究的目的是评估和比较不同的人机界面,以控制严重受损患者的上肢机动外骨骼。不同的方法(即手动,声音,视觉控制)在模拟环境中测试了三个受肌肉萎缩症影响的受试者,目的是评估系统与用户交互的能力,反之亦然。图形用户界面向用户显示外骨骼的模拟行为,用户必须通过将外骨骼末端执行器移动到屏幕上显示的定义虚拟目标来执行空间中的到达任务。对用户与每个控制界面的交互进行具体评估,同时通过系统可用性量表(SUS)问卷对所有三种方法的可用性进行定量评估。所有患者均能无困难地与所有控制界面进行交互,并完成模拟中的伸手任务。SUS得分显示人机控制界面的总体可用性良好,表明手动和语音控制界面是受试者的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信