Comparison of slip-compensated odometry for tracked, four- and six-wheel vehicles

Łukasz Chlebowicz, Mateusz Kujawiński, Damian Wronski, B. Cybulski, G. Granosik
{"title":"Comparison of slip-compensated odometry for tracked, four- and six-wheel vehicles","authors":"Łukasz Chlebowicz, Mateusz Kujawiński, Damian Wronski, B. Cybulski, G. Granosik","doi":"10.1109/spsympo51155.2020.9593508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheel slippage is mostly an unwanted but sometimes inevitable disturbance, especially in mobile robots with over-constrained suspension or operating on slippery surfaces. Improving odometry alone can increase overall localization accuracy, especially when other sources of position information are unavailable. There are several publications dealing with slippage detection and odometry correction, however, they are mostly related to identification of surface for single specific robot type and they require external measurement system for tests. This paper presents a methodology and experiment comparing slip-compensated odometry and tries to extrapolate it to three different suspensions. The main idea behind this article was to check, if different mechanical suspensions with the same kinematic structure (skid-steering), could achieve similar localization accuracy according to the same slip compensation method and using only onboard sensors. The research platform was a custom modular robot. Its chassis allows it to swap the suspension to skid steer six- and four-wheel and tracks. Four chapters of the paper are are organized as follows: in the Introduction, the problem is described in mathematical formulas, then the experiment setup, process and a method for calculating an algorithm-specific coefficient are discussed, followed by presentation of results and summary.","PeriodicalId":380515,"journal":{"name":"2021 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Signal Processing Symposium (SPSympo)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/spsympo51155.2020.9593508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wheel slippage is mostly an unwanted but sometimes inevitable disturbance, especially in mobile robots with over-constrained suspension or operating on slippery surfaces. Improving odometry alone can increase overall localization accuracy, especially when other sources of position information are unavailable. There are several publications dealing with slippage detection and odometry correction, however, they are mostly related to identification of surface for single specific robot type and they require external measurement system for tests. This paper presents a methodology and experiment comparing slip-compensated odometry and tries to extrapolate it to three different suspensions. The main idea behind this article was to check, if different mechanical suspensions with the same kinematic structure (skid-steering), could achieve similar localization accuracy according to the same slip compensation method and using only onboard sensors. The research platform was a custom modular robot. Its chassis allows it to swap the suspension to skid steer six- and four-wheel and tracks. Four chapters of the paper are are organized as follows: in the Introduction, the problem is described in mathematical formulas, then the experiment setup, process and a method for calculating an algorithm-specific coefficient are discussed, followed by presentation of results and summary.
履带式、四轮和六轮车辆滑差补偿里程计的比较
车轮打滑是一种不必要的干扰,但有时是不可避免的,特别是在移动机器人的过度约束悬架或在光滑的表面上操作。仅改进里程计就可以提高整体定位精度,特别是在其他位置信息来源不可用的情况下。关于滑移检测和里程计校正的研究已经有了一些文献,但它们大多是针对单个特定类型的机器人进行表面识别,并且需要外部测量系统进行测试。本文提出了一种比较滑动补偿里程计的方法和实验,并尝试将其推广到三种不同的悬架。本文的主要思想是检验具有相同运动结构(滑移转向)的不同机械悬架是否可以根据相同的滑移补偿方法和仅使用车载传感器获得相似的定位精度。研究平台是一个定制的模块化机器人。它的底盘允许它交换悬架滑移转向六轮和四轮和轨道。论文共分四章:引言部分用数学公式描述了问题,然后讨论了实验的设置、过程和算法特定系数的计算方法,最后给出了结果和总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信