Anticipatory FinTech Regulation: On Deploying Big Data Analytics to Predict the Direction, Impact and Control of Financial Technology

J. Bagby, D. Reitter
{"title":"Anticipatory FinTech Regulation: On Deploying Big Data Analytics to Predict the Direction, Impact and Control of Financial Technology","authors":"J. Bagby, D. Reitter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3456844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial Technologies (FinTech) lie at the heart of disruptive innovation comprising critical infrastructure for much of modern business practice and national security. Modern FinTech sectors are data driven – startup finance, commodities and investment instrumentation, payment systems, trading platforms, exchange markets, market failure regulation, underwriting and syndication, risk assessment and management, advisory services, commercial banking, transaction settlement through financial intermediaries, corporate disclosure and governance, and currencies. This paper demonstrates that most FinTech innovations, scholarship and public policy development are significantly informed by big data analysis balancing: (1) FinTech innovation incentives, (2) market failure forensics, and (3) public policy development. FinTech almost always deserves a wary eye – experience reveals that many FinTech mechanisms externalize social costs of their design flaws, opacity/obscurity and malfunctioning. Some FinTechs appear intended to skirt regulation suffering regulatory lag, the delay following the first appearance of novel FinTechs and the later development, assessment, and deployment of reliable regulatory mechanisms. FinTech policy issues span from the traditional regulation of financial markets, through systemic costs of FinTech intellectual property (IP) concerns and ultimately to national security risks imposed by the financial system’s centrality among critical infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":138725,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3456844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Financial Technologies (FinTech) lie at the heart of disruptive innovation comprising critical infrastructure for much of modern business practice and national security. Modern FinTech sectors are data driven – startup finance, commodities and investment instrumentation, payment systems, trading platforms, exchange markets, market failure regulation, underwriting and syndication, risk assessment and management, advisory services, commercial banking, transaction settlement through financial intermediaries, corporate disclosure and governance, and currencies. This paper demonstrates that most FinTech innovations, scholarship and public policy development are significantly informed by big data analysis balancing: (1) FinTech innovation incentives, (2) market failure forensics, and (3) public policy development. FinTech almost always deserves a wary eye – experience reveals that many FinTech mechanisms externalize social costs of their design flaws, opacity/obscurity and malfunctioning. Some FinTechs appear intended to skirt regulation suffering regulatory lag, the delay following the first appearance of novel FinTechs and the later development, assessment, and deployment of reliable regulatory mechanisms. FinTech policy issues span from the traditional regulation of financial markets, through systemic costs of FinTech intellectual property (IP) concerns and ultimately to national security risks imposed by the financial system’s centrality among critical infrastructures.
预见性金融科技监管:运用大数据分析预测金融科技的方向、影响和控制
金融科技(FinTech)是颠覆性创新的核心,是现代商业实践和国家安全的关键基础设施。现代金融科技行业是数据驱动的——创业融资、大宗商品和投资工具、支付系统、交易平台、交易所市场、市场失灵监管、承销和银团、风险评估和管理、咨询服务、商业银行、通过金融中介机构的交易结算、公司披露和治理,以及货币。本文表明,大多数金融科技创新、学术研究和公共政策制定都在很大程度上受到大数据分析平衡的影响:(1)金融科技创新激励;(2)市场失灵取证;(3)公共政策制定。金融科技几乎总是值得警惕的——经验表明,许多金融科技机制将其设计缺陷、不透明/模糊和故障的社会成本外部化。一些金融科技似乎是为了避开监管,因为监管滞后,新型金融科技首次出现后的延迟,以及后来可靠监管机制的开发、评估和部署。金融科技政策问题从传统的金融市场监管,到金融科技知识产权(IP)问题的系统性成本,最终到金融体系在关键基础设施中的中心地位所带来的国家安全风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信