Do You Think It's Biased? How To Ask For The Perception Of Media Bias

Timo Spinde, Christina Kreuter, W. Gaissmaier, Felix Hamborg, Bela Gipp, H. Giese
{"title":"Do You Think It's Biased? How To Ask For The Perception Of Media Bias","authors":"Timo Spinde, Christina Kreuter, W. Gaissmaier, Felix Hamborg, Bela Gipp, H. Giese","doi":"10.1109/JCDL52503.2021.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Media coverage possesses a substantial effect on the public perception of events. The way media frames events can significantly alter the beliefs and perceptions of our society. Nevertheless, nearly all media outlets are known to report news in a biased way. While such bias can be introduced by altering the word choice or omitting information, the perception of bias also varies largely depending on a reader's personal background. Therefore, media bias is a very complex construct to identify and analyze. Even though media bias has been the subject of many studies, previous assessment strategies are oversimplified, lack overlap and empirical evaluation. Thus, this study aims to develop a scale that can be used as a reliable standard to evaluate article bias. To name an example: Intending to measure bias in a news article, should we ask, “How biased is the article?” or should we instead ask, “How did the article treat the American president?”. We conducted a literature search to find 824 relevant questions about text perception in previous research on the topic. In a multi-iterative process, we summarized and condensed these questions semantically to conclude a complete and representative set of possible question types about bias. The final set consisted of 25 questions with varying answering formats, 17 questions using semantic differentials, and six ratings of feelings. We tested each of the questions on 190 articles with overall 663 participants to identify how well the questions measure an article's perceived bias. Our results show that 21 final items are suitable and reliable for measuring the perception of media bias. We publish the final set of questions on http://bias-guestion-tree.gipplab.org/.","PeriodicalId":112400,"journal":{"name":"2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL52503.2021.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Media coverage possesses a substantial effect on the public perception of events. The way media frames events can significantly alter the beliefs and perceptions of our society. Nevertheless, nearly all media outlets are known to report news in a biased way. While such bias can be introduced by altering the word choice or omitting information, the perception of bias also varies largely depending on a reader's personal background. Therefore, media bias is a very complex construct to identify and analyze. Even though media bias has been the subject of many studies, previous assessment strategies are oversimplified, lack overlap and empirical evaluation. Thus, this study aims to develop a scale that can be used as a reliable standard to evaluate article bias. To name an example: Intending to measure bias in a news article, should we ask, “How biased is the article?” or should we instead ask, “How did the article treat the American president?”. We conducted a literature search to find 824 relevant questions about text perception in previous research on the topic. In a multi-iterative process, we summarized and condensed these questions semantically to conclude a complete and representative set of possible question types about bias. The final set consisted of 25 questions with varying answering formats, 17 questions using semantic differentials, and six ratings of feelings. We tested each of the questions on 190 articles with overall 663 participants to identify how well the questions measure an article's perceived bias. Our results show that 21 final items are suitable and reliable for measuring the perception of media bias. We publish the final set of questions on http://bias-guestion-tree.gipplab.org/.
你认为它有偏见吗?如何要求媒体偏见的感知
媒体报道对公众对事件的看法有很大的影响。媒体塑造事件的方式可以显著地改变我们社会的信念和观念。然而,几乎所有的媒体都以有偏见的方式报道新闻。虽然这种偏见可以通过改变词的选择或省略信息来引入,但偏见的感知也在很大程度上取决于读者的个人背景。因此,媒体偏见是一个非常复杂的结构,难以识别和分析。尽管媒体偏见已经成为许多研究的主题,但以往的评估策略过于简化,缺乏重叠和实证评估。因此,本研究旨在编制一个量表,作为评估文章偏倚的可靠标准。举个例子:想要衡量一篇新闻文章的偏见,我们是否应该问:“这篇文章有多偏颇?”或者我们应该问,“这篇文章是如何对待美国总统的?”我们进行了文献检索,在之前的研究中找到了824个关于文本感知的相关问题。在一个多次迭代的过程中,我们对这些问题进行了语义上的总结和浓缩,得出了一组完整的、有代表性的关于偏见的可能问题类型。最后一组包括25个不同回答格式的问题,17个使用语义差异的问题,以及6个情感评级。我们对190篇文章中的每个问题进行了测试,总共有663名参与者,以确定这些问题在多大程度上衡量了一篇文章的感知偏见。我们的研究结果表明,21个最终项目适合和可靠的测量媒体偏见的感知。我们在http://bias-guestion-tree.gipplab.org/上发布了最后一组问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信