Doubtful revolutions and counter-revolutions deconstructed

Alina Mungiu‐Pippidi
{"title":"Doubtful revolutions and counter-revolutions deconstructed","authors":"Alina Mungiu‐Pippidi","doi":"10.1080/14613190600595721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 15 December 1989, in the Romanian city of Timisoara, a huge crowd waiting for the chronically late tramway caught word of a nearby altercation between dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu’s secret service, Securitate, and a few Hungarian parishioners protesting the arrest of their priest. Although they were mostly Romanians, they allied with the parishioners against the Securitate. The altercation turned into an uprising after shots were fired by the Army. After a couple of days of escalation, by which time the whole city had joined the insurgents and had occupied the official buildings, Ceauşescu denounced it as the work of ‘foreign terrorists’. To counteract, he convoked the usual formal meeting of support in the capital Bucharest. However, a part of the crowd turned against him. He fled the city the next day, only to be found and shot in the midst of national panic created by sniper fire and collective hysteria. The regime which followed after him, resulting from the first free though unfair elections (1990), took a care to seal the archives concerning these events by means of a National Security Law passed in 1991. People have been left since puzzling over who were the alleged ‘Arab terrorists’. As the Western media originally reported a huge death toll the mere 1000 actually certified dead, although the highest of Eastern European revolutions, has been viewed since with some disappointment and suspicion. In Andijan, a small city in post-Soviet authoritarian Uzbekistan, where the monopoly of power of President Islam Karimov had still been unshaken, violence broke out on 13 May 2005. A small armed mob, Islamic ‘terrorists’ by government accounts, attacked the jail and set free the prisoners, then occupied the main official buildings. The local people gathered in the main square, according to some sources answering a call from the President who had flown in to address them as Ceauşescu had done, according to others by curiosity only. By late afternoon the square was surrounded by security forces. The government","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On 15 December 1989, in the Romanian city of Timisoara, a huge crowd waiting for the chronically late tramway caught word of a nearby altercation between dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu’s secret service, Securitate, and a few Hungarian parishioners protesting the arrest of their priest. Although they were mostly Romanians, they allied with the parishioners against the Securitate. The altercation turned into an uprising after shots were fired by the Army. After a couple of days of escalation, by which time the whole city had joined the insurgents and had occupied the official buildings, Ceauşescu denounced it as the work of ‘foreign terrorists’. To counteract, he convoked the usual formal meeting of support in the capital Bucharest. However, a part of the crowd turned against him. He fled the city the next day, only to be found and shot in the midst of national panic created by sniper fire and collective hysteria. The regime which followed after him, resulting from the first free though unfair elections (1990), took a care to seal the archives concerning these events by means of a National Security Law passed in 1991. People have been left since puzzling over who were the alleged ‘Arab terrorists’. As the Western media originally reported a huge death toll the mere 1000 actually certified dead, although the highest of Eastern European revolutions, has been viewed since with some disappointment and suspicion. In Andijan, a small city in post-Soviet authoritarian Uzbekistan, where the monopoly of power of President Islam Karimov had still been unshaken, violence broke out on 13 May 2005. A small armed mob, Islamic ‘terrorists’ by government accounts, attacked the jail and set free the prisoners, then occupied the main official buildings. The local people gathered in the main square, according to some sources answering a call from the President who had flown in to address them as Ceauşescu had done, according to others by curiosity only. By late afternoon the square was surrounded by security forces. The government
可疑的革命和反革命被解构
1989年12月15日,在罗马尼亚的蒂米什瓦拉市,一大群人在等待长期晚点的有轨电车,他们听到了独裁者尼古拉·齐奥埃斯库(Nicolae ceauescu)的秘密机构Securitate与一些抗议他们的牧师被捕的匈牙利教区居民在附近发生争执的消息。虽然他们大多是罗马尼亚人,但他们与教区居民联合起来反对安全机构。在军队开枪后,这场争吵演变成了一场起义。经过几天的升级,整个城市都加入了叛乱分子的行列,占领了官方大楼,ceauescu谴责这是“外国恐怖分子”的行径。为了反击,他在首都布加勒斯特召集了通常的正式支持会议。然而,人群中的一部分人反对他。第二天,他逃离了这座城市,却在狙击手的火力和集体歇斯底里造成的全国恐慌中被发现并被枪杀。在他之后的政权,在第一次自由但不公平的选举(1990年)之后,通过1991年通过的《国家安全法》,小心翼翼地封存了与这些事件有关的档案。从那以后,人们一直在困惑谁是所谓的“阿拉伯恐怖分子”。西方媒体最初报道了巨大的死亡人数,尽管是东欧革命中最高的,但实际证实的死亡人数只有1000人,从那时起,人们就带着一些失望和怀疑的眼光看待这场革命。2005年5月13日,安集延(Andijan)爆发了暴力事件。安集延是前苏联独裁统治下的乌兹别克斯坦的一个小城市,总统伊斯兰·卡里莫夫(Islam Karimov)对权力的垄断仍未动摇。一小群武装暴徒,被政府称为伊斯兰“恐怖分子”,袭击了监狱,释放了囚犯,然后占领了主要的官方建筑。据一些消息来源说,当地人民聚集在主要广场上,是为了响应总统的电话,总统像ceauescu那样飞过来向他们讲话,另一些消息来源说,这只是出于好奇。下午晚些时候,广场被安全部队包围。政府
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信