Post-Lesbian Tensions: A Qualitative Inquiry of Lesbian Identity

Anastasja Giacomuzzi, Hadas Tal
{"title":"Post-Lesbian Tensions: A Qualitative Inquiry of Lesbian Identity","authors":"Anastasja Giacomuzzi, Hadas Tal","doi":"10.15273/jue.v12i1.11313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how lesbians aged 18 to 25 negotiate their sexual identity in relation to post-lesbian discourse. Post-lesbian discourse refers to the postmodern conceptualisation of lesbian identity as irrelevant, unnecessary, and minor because of increased acceptance of homosexuality and the popularity of queer theory and its deconstruction of identity categories. In three small focus groups with a total of 10 participants, we explored the themes of word usage, meanings, and associations, as well as exclusion, boundaries, and stigma. We found that our participants’ disdain and discomfort with the word “lesbian” does not result, as post-lesbian discourse would suggest, from its irrelevance but rather due to the old yet persisting stigmas towards lesbian sexuality. To mitigate these stigmas, most of our participants use gender-neutral terms, most notably the word “gay,” to describe themselves. Using relevant literature, we contextualise the usage of gender-neutral terms and analyse their often-overlooked negative impact on female and lesbian visibility. Moreover, we found that while participants wished to avoid the exclusion and specificity of lesbian spaces, they desired these spaces all the same, which had a positive effect on their identity formation, confidence, and sense of community.","PeriodicalId":298867,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/jue.v12i1.11313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how lesbians aged 18 to 25 negotiate their sexual identity in relation to post-lesbian discourse. Post-lesbian discourse refers to the postmodern conceptualisation of lesbian identity as irrelevant, unnecessary, and minor because of increased acceptance of homosexuality and the popularity of queer theory and its deconstruction of identity categories. In three small focus groups with a total of 10 participants, we explored the themes of word usage, meanings, and associations, as well as exclusion, boundaries, and stigma. We found that our participants’ disdain and discomfort with the word “lesbian” does not result, as post-lesbian discourse would suggest, from its irrelevance but rather due to the old yet persisting stigmas towards lesbian sexuality. To mitigate these stigmas, most of our participants use gender-neutral terms, most notably the word “gay,” to describe themselves. Using relevant literature, we contextualise the usage of gender-neutral terms and analyse their often-overlooked negative impact on female and lesbian visibility. Moreover, we found that while participants wished to avoid the exclusion and specificity of lesbian spaces, they desired these spaces all the same, which had a positive effect on their identity formation, confidence, and sense of community.
后女同性恋紧张关系:女同性恋身份的定性探究
本文探讨了18至25岁的女同性恋者如何在后女同性恋话语中协商自己的性别身份。后女同性恋话语是指女同性恋身份的后现代概念化,因为同性恋的接受程度越来越高,酷儿理论的流行及其对身份类别的解构,女同性恋身份被认为是无关紧要的、不必要的、次要的。在共有10名参与者的三个小型焦点小组中,我们探讨了单词使用,含义和关联以及排斥,边界和耻辱的主题。我们发现,我们的参与者对“女同性恋”这个词的蔑视和不适,并不像后女同性恋话语所暗示的那样,是因为它不相关,而是因为对女同性恋性行为的古老而持续的耻辱。为了减轻这些耻辱感,我们的大多数参与者使用性别中立的术语来描述自己,最明显的是“同性恋”这个词。利用相关文献,我们将中性术语的使用置于语境中,并分析它们经常被忽视的对女性和女同性恋可见度的负面影响。此外,我们发现,虽然参与者希望避免女同性恋空间的排他性和特殊性,但他们仍然渴望这些空间,这对他们的身份形成、自信和社区意识有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信