Criticism of the role of trust in e-government services

A. Bayaga, M. Kyobe, Jacques Ophoff
{"title":"Criticism of the role of trust in e-government services","authors":"A. Bayaga, M. Kyobe, Jacques Ophoff","doi":"10.1109/ICTAS47918.2020.233973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the growing interest in the topic of e-government services’ adoption, which is believed to be obstructed by the multifaceted nature of lacking trust, the objective of the current research was to examine the adoption and role of trust in e-government services. The current research took the approach of a systematic review of previous work, which was positioned upon researching trust as an influencer of e-government services’ adoption. Guided by the theoretical framework, and based on the researched and reviewed findings, the conclusion reached as a potential for increasing trust in e-government services was first, to consider the various types of trust and their dimensions/requirements. The second recommendation was to test how these requirements influence e-government services such as e-voting (e-election), e-tax [e-filing], e-health (m-health), e-banking, e-commerce, and e-learning (m-learning). Another crucial attribute to be considered is (1) the best predictor(s) for these requirements, and (2) how the variation of continued use of e-government services could be explained by the types of trust and their dimensions.","PeriodicalId":431012,"journal":{"name":"2020 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAS47918.2020.233973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Following the growing interest in the topic of e-government services’ adoption, which is believed to be obstructed by the multifaceted nature of lacking trust, the objective of the current research was to examine the adoption and role of trust in e-government services. The current research took the approach of a systematic review of previous work, which was positioned upon researching trust as an influencer of e-government services’ adoption. Guided by the theoretical framework, and based on the researched and reviewed findings, the conclusion reached as a potential for increasing trust in e-government services was first, to consider the various types of trust and their dimensions/requirements. The second recommendation was to test how these requirements influence e-government services such as e-voting (e-election), e-tax [e-filing], e-health (m-health), e-banking, e-commerce, and e-learning (m-learning). Another crucial attribute to be considered is (1) the best predictor(s) for these requirements, and (2) how the variation of continued use of e-government services could be explained by the types of trust and their dimensions.
对信任在电子政务服务中的作用的批评
随着人们对电子政务服务采用这一主题的兴趣日益浓厚,人们认为缺乏信任的多方面性质阻碍了电子政务服务的采用,本研究的目的是研究信任在电子政务服务中的采用和作用。目前的研究采用了对以往工作进行系统回顾的方法,其定位是研究信任是电子政务服务采用的影响因素。在理论框架的指导下,基于研究和回顾的结果,得出的结论是,首先要考虑各种类型的信任及其维度/要求,以提高电子政务服务的信任。第二项建议是测试这些要求如何影响电子政务服务,如电子投票(电子选举)、电子税收(电子申报)、电子保健(移动保健)、电子银行、电子商务和电子学习(移动学习)。需要考虑的另一个关键属性是(1)这些需求的最佳预测器,以及(2)如何通过信任类型及其维度来解释电子政务服务持续使用的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信