Optical reflectance across spatial scales—an intercomparison of transect-based hyperspectral, drone, and satellite reflectance data for dry season rangeland

Glenn Slade, D. Fawcett, Andrew M. Cunliffe, R. Brazier, Kamal Nyaupane, M. Mauritz, S. Vargas, K. Anderson
{"title":"Optical reflectance across spatial scales—an intercomparison of transect-based hyperspectral, drone, and satellite reflectance data for dry season rangeland","authors":"Glenn Slade, D. Fawcett, Andrew M. Cunliffe, R. Brazier, Kamal Nyaupane, M. Mauritz, S. Vargas, K. Anderson","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drone-based multispectral sensing is a valuable tool for dryland spatial ecology, yet there has been limited investigation of the reproducibility of measurements from drone-mounted multispectral camera array systems or the intercomparison between drone-derived measurements, field spectroscopy, and satellite data. Using radiometrically calibrated data from two multispectral drone sensors (MicaSense RedEdge (MRE) and Parrot Sequoia (PS)) co-located with a transect of hyperspectral measurements (tramway) in the Chihuahuan desert (New Mexico, USA), we found a high degree of correspondence within individual drone data sets, but that reflectance measurements and vegetation indices varied between field, drone, and satellite sensors. In comparison to field spectra, MRE had a negative bias, while PS had a positive bias. In comparison to Sentinel-2, PS showed the best agreement, while MRE had a negative bias for all bands. A variogram analysis of NDVI showed that ecological pattern information was lost at grains coarser than 1.8 m, indicating that drone-based multispectral sensors provide information at an appropriate spatial grain to capture the heterogeneity and spectral variability of this dryland ecosystem in a dry season state. Investigators using similar workflows should understand the need to account for biases between sensors. Modelling spatial and spectral upscaling between drone and satellite data remains an important research priority.","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drone-based multispectral sensing is a valuable tool for dryland spatial ecology, yet there has been limited investigation of the reproducibility of measurements from drone-mounted multispectral camera array systems or the intercomparison between drone-derived measurements, field spectroscopy, and satellite data. Using radiometrically calibrated data from two multispectral drone sensors (MicaSense RedEdge (MRE) and Parrot Sequoia (PS)) co-located with a transect of hyperspectral measurements (tramway) in the Chihuahuan desert (New Mexico, USA), we found a high degree of correspondence within individual drone data sets, but that reflectance measurements and vegetation indices varied between field, drone, and satellite sensors. In comparison to field spectra, MRE had a negative bias, while PS had a positive bias. In comparison to Sentinel-2, PS showed the best agreement, while MRE had a negative bias for all bands. A variogram analysis of NDVI showed that ecological pattern information was lost at grains coarser than 1.8 m, indicating that drone-based multispectral sensors provide information at an appropriate spatial grain to capture the heterogeneity and spectral variability of this dryland ecosystem in a dry season state. Investigators using similar workflows should understand the need to account for biases between sensors. Modelling spatial and spectral upscaling between drone and satellite data remains an important research priority.
跨空间尺度的光学反射率——旱季牧场基于样条的高光谱、无人机和卫星反射率数据的相互比较
基于无人机的多光谱传感是研究旱地空间生态的重要工具,然而,对无人机安装的多光谱相机阵列系统测量结果的可重复性或无人机测量结果、野外光谱和卫星数据之间的相互比较的研究有限。利用两个多光谱无人机传感器(MicaSense reddge (MRE)和Parrot Sequoia (PS))的辐射校准数据,以及位于美国新墨西哥州奇瓦瓦沙漠(Chihuahuan desert)的高光谱测量样带(tramway),我们发现单个无人机数据集之间的高度对应,但反射率测量值和植被指数在野外、无人机和卫星传感器之间存在差异。与场谱相比,MRE具有负偏置,而PS具有正偏置。与Sentinel-2相比,PS的一致性最好,而MRE在所有波段都有负偏倚。NDVI变异函数分析表明,在大于1.8 m的粒度上,生态格局信息丢失,表明无人机多光谱传感器在合适的空间粒度上提供了信息,可以捕捉旱季状态下该旱地生态系统的异质性和光谱变异。使用类似工作流程的调查人员应该理解需要考虑传感器之间的偏差。无人机和卫星数据之间的空间和光谱升级建模仍然是一个重要的研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信