The realization of prosodic categories in political media discourse in British and American linguacultures

L. V. Milyaeva
{"title":"The realization of prosodic categories in political media discourse in British and American linguacultures","authors":"L. V. Milyaeva","doi":"10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-2-10-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of the article is to describe, analyze and compare main prosodic categories that are realized in a unique context, namely in political media discourse. The article looks into the principles of classification of the prosodic categories as well as at realizational differences of three main prosodic categories: syllable, foot and intonation phrase. These categories are distinguished unanimously by the majority of the researchers and are described in the article form their structural and cognitive perspectives. The realizational differences of these categories derive from pragmatic and linguacultural features of English media communication. In the article media communication is represented with political media discourse which is understood as a new contextual model of media communication and is characterized by high degree of immediacy and interactivity. Certain attention in the article is given to the results of the comparative research of the realizational differences of the prosodic categories done by the author. On the basis of the data resulted from the prosodic and content analysis the author concludes that the realizational differences of the prosodic categories are often due to pragmatics of the discourse and the type of discourse itself.","PeriodicalId":222389,"journal":{"name":"Professional Discourse & Communication","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Discourse & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-2-10-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of the article is to describe, analyze and compare main prosodic categories that are realized in a unique context, namely in political media discourse. The article looks into the principles of classification of the prosodic categories as well as at realizational differences of three main prosodic categories: syllable, foot and intonation phrase. These categories are distinguished unanimously by the majority of the researchers and are described in the article form their structural and cognitive perspectives. The realizational differences of these categories derive from pragmatic and linguacultural features of English media communication. In the article media communication is represented with political media discourse which is understood as a new contextual model of media communication and is characterized by high degree of immediacy and interactivity. Certain attention in the article is given to the results of the comparative research of the realizational differences of the prosodic categories done by the author. On the basis of the data resulted from the prosodic and content analysis the author concludes that the realizational differences of the prosodic categories are often due to pragmatics of the discourse and the type of discourse itself.
英美语言文化政治媒介话语中韵律范畴的实现
本文的主要目的是描述、分析和比较在一个独特的语境中,即在政治媒体话语中实现的主要韵律类别。本文探讨了韵律类别的分类原则,以及音节、步和语调短语这三个主要韵律类别在实现上的差异。这些类别得到了大多数研究者的一致区分,并在文章中从它们的结构和认知角度进行了描述。这些范畴的实现差异源于英语媒介传播的语用特征和语言文化特征。在本文中,媒介传播以政治媒介话语为代表,政治媒介话语被理解为媒介传播的一种新的语境模式,具有高度的即时性和互动性。本文对作者所做的韵律范畴实现差异的比较研究结果给予了一定的关注。根据韵律和内容分析的数据,作者得出结论,韵律类别的实现差异往往是由语篇的语用和语篇本身的类型造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信