D. Lyon
{"title":"Surveillance, transparency, and trust","authors":"D. Lyon","doi":"10.4324/9781003120827-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global pandemic that began in 2019 and spread in waves of contagion throughout the world was met with increased modes of surveillance that accentuated the vexing issues of data circulation. These were already the stuff of government commissions, academic research, company policy, and privacy and data protection regimes the world over. But now they present themselves as even more troubling conundrums. More data may be acquired through centralized systems, deemed useful for risk modeling and analysis. But without clear limits, once in government hands, those data could easily be used for other, potentially more negative surveillance purposes. Beyond privacy and security concerns are important ethical and justice issues such as vulnerability and civil liberties. Greater transparency, understood as accountability, could contribute to trust, as a vital dimension of ways in which technologies could be shaped to truly human ends. Thus, today, the development of surveillance systems, devices, and apps should be guided by criteria whose shorthand here is “human flourishing.”. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Lora Anne Viola and Paweł Laidler;.","PeriodicalId":152463,"journal":{"name":"Trust and Transparency in an Age of Surveillance","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trust and Transparency in an Age of Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120827-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
监督、透明和信任
这场始于2019年的全球大流行在世界各地掀起了一波又一波的传染浪潮,随之而来的是监测模式的增加,这加剧了令人烦恼的数据流通问题。这些已经是世界各地政府委员会、学术研究、公司政策以及隐私和数据保护制度的内容。但现在,它们表现出了更令人不安的难题。可以通过集中系统获得更多的数据,这些数据被认为对风险建模和分析有用。但如果没有明确的限制,这些数据一旦落入政府手中,就很容易被用于其他可能更为负面的监视目的。除了隐私和安全问题之外,还有重要的道德和正义问题,如脆弱性和公民自由。更大的透明度,被理解为问责制,可以促进信任,作为技术可以被塑造为真正人类目的的方式的一个重要方面。因此,今天,监控系统、设备和应用程序的发展应该以“人类繁荣”的标准为指导。©2022选择和编辑事项,Lora Anne Viola和paweowlaidler;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。