End-user encounters with lambda abstraction in spreadsheets: Apollo’s bow or Achilles’ heel?

Advait Sarkar, Sruti Srinivasa Srinivasa Ragavan, J. Williams, A. Gordon
{"title":"End-user encounters with lambda abstraction in spreadsheets: Apollo’s bow or Achilles’ heel?","authors":"Advait Sarkar, Sruti Srinivasa Srinivasa Ragavan, J. Williams, A. Gordon","doi":"10.1109/vl/hcc53370.2022.9833131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—The value of computational abstractions to non- expert end-user programmers is contentious. We study reactions to the LAMBDA function in Microsoft Excel, which enables users to define their own functions using the spreadsheet formula language, through a thematic analysis of nearly 2,700 comments posted on the Reddit, Hacker News, YouTube, and Microsoft Tech Community online forums. We find that computational abstractions are viewed both as helpful and harmful, that users encounter learning and understanding barriers to applying them, and that there are deficiencies and opportunities in tooling such as in formula editing, versioning, reuse and sharing. We find that the introduction of LAMBDA prompts new debate around whether spreadsheets are code, whether writing formulas can be considered programming, and whether spreadsheet users identify themselves as programmers.","PeriodicalId":351709,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/vl/hcc53370.2022.9833131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

—The value of computational abstractions to non- expert end-user programmers is contentious. We study reactions to the LAMBDA function in Microsoft Excel, which enables users to define their own functions using the spreadsheet formula language, through a thematic analysis of nearly 2,700 comments posted on the Reddit, Hacker News, YouTube, and Microsoft Tech Community online forums. We find that computational abstractions are viewed both as helpful and harmful, that users encounter learning and understanding barriers to applying them, and that there are deficiencies and opportunities in tooling such as in formula editing, versioning, reuse and sharing. We find that the introduction of LAMBDA prompts new debate around whether spreadsheets are code, whether writing formulas can be considered programming, and whether spreadsheet users identify themselves as programmers.
最终用户在电子表格中遇到lambda抽象:阿波罗之弓还是阿喀琉斯之踵?
计算抽象对非专家的最终用户程序员的价值是有争议的。我们通过对Reddit、Hacker News、YouTube和Microsoft Tech Community在线论坛上发布的近2700条评论的主题分析,研究了用户对Microsoft Excel中LAMBDA函数的反应,该函数允许用户使用电子表格公式语言定义自己的函数。我们发现,计算抽象既被视为有益的,也被视为有害的,用户在应用它们时遇到了学习和理解的障碍,并且在公式编辑、版本控制、重用和共享等工具方面存在缺陷和机会。我们发现LAMBDA的引入引发了关于电子表格是否是代码、编写公式是否可以被视为编程以及电子表格用户是否将自己视为程序员的新争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信