Pharmacoepidemiology and patient safety in the critically ill

A. Patanwala, J. Barletta, B. Erstad
{"title":"Pharmacoepidemiology and patient safety in the critically ill","authors":"A. Patanwala, J. Barletta, B. Erstad","doi":"10.3233/PPL-2011-0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critically ill patients are at the greatest risk of experiencing preventable and non-preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) compared to other patient populations. Information on ADEs concerning these patients is derived from a wide spectrum of sources such as surveillance studies involving large databases to landmark clinical investigations. Historically there has been a lack of consistency with regard to definitions of commonly used terms such as medication error, ADE, and preventability, which is a fundamental to appropriately conduct and interpret results of epidemiological investigations in this setting. However, attempts have been made to standardize this terminology by national organizations. The increased risk of ADEs in the critically ill patient population is due to a variety of reasons, which include the routine use of the intravenous route of drug administration, medications with a low therapeutic index and high complexity, ‘off-label’ use and an environment that may be conducive to errors. Reporting of ADEs is largely voluntary and is generally underreported and skewed towards the most serious events. Other methods for surveillance of ADEs in the critical care setting include medical record review and direct observation. Each of these methods has their own limitations and the data obtained can vary depending on the method used. A combination of data from all of these methods is likely to produce the most comprehensive information to improve patient safety.","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2011-0344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critically ill patients are at the greatest risk of experiencing preventable and non-preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) compared to other patient populations. Information on ADEs concerning these patients is derived from a wide spectrum of sources such as surveillance studies involving large databases to landmark clinical investigations. Historically there has been a lack of consistency with regard to definitions of commonly used terms such as medication error, ADE, and preventability, which is a fundamental to appropriately conduct and interpret results of epidemiological investigations in this setting. However, attempts have been made to standardize this terminology by national organizations. The increased risk of ADEs in the critically ill patient population is due to a variety of reasons, which include the routine use of the intravenous route of drug administration, medications with a low therapeutic index and high complexity, ‘off-label’ use and an environment that may be conducive to errors. Reporting of ADEs is largely voluntary and is generally underreported and skewed towards the most serious events. Other methods for surveillance of ADEs in the critical care setting include medical record review and direct observation. Each of these methods has their own limitations and the data obtained can vary depending on the method used. A combination of data from all of these methods is likely to produce the most comprehensive information to improve patient safety.
危重患者的药物流行病学与患者安全
与其他患者群体相比,危重患者经历可预防和不可预防药物不良事件(ADEs)的风险最大。与这些患者有关的不良事件信息来源于广泛的来源,如涉及大型数据库的监测研究以及具有里程碑意义的临床调查。从历史上看,常用术语的定义缺乏一致性,如用药错误、ADE和可预防性,这是在这种情况下适当进行和解释流行病学调查结果的基础。然而,国家组织已试图使这一术语标准化。危重患者人群中ade风险的增加是由于多种原因造成的,包括常规使用静脉给药途径,治疗指数低且复杂性高的药物,“超说明书”使用以及可能导致错误的环境。对不良事件的报告在很大程度上是自愿的,通常被低估,并倾向于最严重的事件。在重症监护环境中监测不良事件的其他方法包括病历回顾和直接观察。每种方法都有其自身的局限性,所获得的数据可能因使用的方法而异。将所有这些方法的数据结合起来,可能会产生最全面的信息,以改善患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信