An Integrative Review of Qualitative Strategy Research: Presenting 12 “Designs-in-Use”

J. Lê, Torsten Schmid
{"title":"An Integrative Review of Qualitative Strategy Research: Presenting 12 “Designs-in-Use”","authors":"J. Lê, Torsten Schmid","doi":"10.1108/S1479-838720190000011009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While qualitative work has a long tradition in the strategy field and has recently regained popularity, we have not paused to take stock of how such work offers contributions. We address this oversight with a review of qualitative studies of strategy published in five top-tier journals over an extended period of fifteen years (2003-2017). In an attempt to organize the field, we develop an empirically grounded organizing framework. We identify twelve designs that are evident in the literature, or ‘designs-in-use’ as we call them. Acknowledging important similarities and differences between the various approaches to qualitative strategy research, we group these designs into three ‘families’ based on their philosophical orientation. We use these designs and families to identify trends in qualitative strategy research. We then engage those trends to orient the future development of qualitative methods in the strategy field.","PeriodicalId":172495,"journal":{"name":"Standing on the Shoulders of Giants","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Standing on the Shoulders of Giants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720190000011009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

While qualitative work has a long tradition in the strategy field and has recently regained popularity, we have not paused to take stock of how such work offers contributions. We address this oversight with a review of qualitative studies of strategy published in five top-tier journals over an extended period of fifteen years (2003-2017). In an attempt to organize the field, we develop an empirically grounded organizing framework. We identify twelve designs that are evident in the literature, or ‘designs-in-use’ as we call them. Acknowledging important similarities and differences between the various approaches to qualitative strategy research, we group these designs into three ‘families’ based on their philosophical orientation. We use these designs and families to identify trends in qualitative strategy research. We then engage those trends to orient the future development of qualitative methods in the strategy field.
定性策略研究综述:12个“使用中的设计”
虽然定性工作在战略领域有着悠久的传统,最近又重新受到欢迎,但我们并没有停下来评估这种工作是如何作出贡献的。我们通过回顾15年来(2003-2017年)在五家顶级期刊上发表的战略定性研究来解决这一疏忽。为了组织这个领域,我们发展了一个基于经验的组织框架。我们确定了12个在文献中很明显的设计,或者我们称之为“使用中的设计”。认识到各种定性策略研究方法之间的重要异同,我们根据其哲学取向将这些设计分为三个“家族”。我们使用这些设计和家族来确定定性策略研究的趋势。然后,我们利用这些趋势来定位定性方法在战略领域的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信